Literature DB >> 16792518

Public attitudes toward genetic testing: perceived benefits and objections.

Lidewij Henneman1, Danielle R M Timmermans, Gerrit Van Der Wal.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess public attitudes toward the availability and use of genetic tests to explore support for genomics developments and to help improve public discussion. Questionnaires to assess the assumed advantages and disadvantages of genetic testing were sent to a representative sample of the Dutch population (n = 1,308; age > or =25 years). The response was 63% (817/1,308). Two groups with extreme scores on a four-item scale were distinguished, representing opponents (n = 248) and supporters (n = 264) of the availability and use of genetic tests. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that those who were familiar with a genetic disease (odds ratio [OR] 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.89; p = 0.015), those who scored higher on a four-item scale on belief in personal benefits of testing (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.21-0.40; p < 0.0001), and those who believe that knowledge of the genetic background of disease will help people to live more healthy lives (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.37-0.62; p < 0.0001), were less likely to be opponents. Those who agreed that genetic testing is tampering with nature (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.32-2.00; p < 0.0001) were more likely to be opponents. Other variables such as belief in genetic determinism, genetic knowledge, level of education, age, and gender were not significantly associated. These results suggest that in addition to moral acceptability, perceived usefulness is a precondition for supporting genetic testing. It is not expected that more information will necessarily result in more positive attitudes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16792518     DOI: 10.1089/gte.2006.10.139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test        ISSN: 1090-6576


  29 in total

Review 1.  Personal utility in genomic testing: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Jennefer N Kohler; Erin Turbitt; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Factors Associated with Acceptability, Consideration and Intention of Uptake of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Survey Study.

Authors:  Kelly F J Stewart; Daša Kokole; Anke Wesselius; Annemie M W J Schols; Maurice P Zeegers; Hein de Vries; Liesbeth A D M van Osch
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Expanded genetic carrier screening in clinical practice: a current survey of patient impressions and attitudes.

Authors:  Nigel Pereira; Michelle Wood; Emerly Luong; Allison Briggs; Michael Galloway; Rose A Maxwell; Steven R Lindheim
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Gene-environment interactions and health inequalities: views of underserved communities.

Authors:  Aaron J Goldenberg; Christopher D Hartmann; Laura Morello; Sanjur Brooks; Kari Colón-Zimmermann; Patricia A Marshall
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-03-15

5.  Genetic knowledge and attitudes of parents of children with congenital heart defects.

Authors:  Sara M Fitzgerald-Butt; Jennifer Klima; Kelly Kelleher; Deena Chisolm; Kim L McBride
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  Attitudes towards cannabis use and genetic testing for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jason Schiffman; Ryan E Lawrence; Caroline Demro; Paul S Appelbaum; Lisa B Dixon
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 2.732

7.  Patient and provider perspectives on the development of personalized medicine: a mixed-methods approach.

Authors:  Lauren Puryear; Natalie Downs; Andrea Nevedal; Eleanor T Lewis; Kelly E Ormond; Maria Bregendahl; Carlos J Suarez; Sean P David; Steven Charlap; Isabella Chu; Steven M Asch; Neda Pakdaman; Sang-Ick Chang; Mark R Cullen; Latha Palaniappan
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-12-27

8.  Ethnicity, educational level and attitudes contribute to parental intentions about genetic testing for child obesity.

Authors:  Paul L Kocken; Meinou H C Theunissen; Yvonne Schönbeck; Lidewij Henneman; A Cecile J W Janssens; Symone B Detmar
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-02-07

9.  Public attitudes towards genetic testing revisited: comparing opinions between 2002 and 2010.

Authors:  Lidewij Henneman; Eric Vermeulen; Carla G van El; Liesbeth Claassen; Danielle R M Timmermans; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Views of the importance of psychiatric genetic research by potential volunteers from stakeholder groups.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Tenzin Tsungmey; Jane Paik Kim; Melinda Hantke
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.