OBJECTIVES: We compared early parenteral nutrition (PN) and early enteral immunonutrition (iEN) in critically ill patients, distinguishing those with and without severe sepsis or septic shock (SS) on admission to intensive care units (ICUs). DESIGN AND SETTING: Multicenter, randomized, unblinded clinical trial in 33 Italian general ICUs. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: The study included 326 patients, 287 of whom did not have SS on ICU admission. Eligibility criteria excluded the two tails in the spectrum of critical conditions, i.e., patients either too well or too ill. Of the patients recruited 160 were randomized to iEN (142 without SS) and 166 to PN (145 without SS). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to two arms: early iEN or early PN. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Primary endpoint was 28-day mortality for all patients and the occurrence of SS during ICU stay for patients admitted without such condition. While 28-day mortality did not differ between iEN and PN (15.6% vs. 15.1%), patients without SS who received iEN had fewer episodes of severe sepsis or septic shock (4.9% vs. 13.1%). ICU length of stay was 4 days shorter in patients given iEN. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to parenteral nutrition iEN appears to be beneficial in critical patients without severe sepsis or septic shock. Parenteral nutrition in these patients should be abandoned, at least when enteral nutrition can be administered, even at an initial low caloric content.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: We compared early parenteral nutrition (PN) and early enteral immunonutrition (iEN) in critically illpatients, distinguishing those with and without severe sepsis or septic shock (SS) on admission to intensive care units (ICUs). DESIGN AND SETTING: Multicenter, randomized, unblinded clinical trial in 33 Italian general ICUs. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: The study included 326 patients, 287 of whom did not have SS on ICU admission. Eligibility criteria excluded the two tails in the spectrum of critical conditions, i.e., patients either too well or too ill. Of the patients recruited 160 were randomized to iEN (142 without SS) and 166 to PN (145 without SS). INTERVENTIONS:Patients were randomized to two arms: early iEN or early PN. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Primary endpoint was 28-day mortality for all patients and the occurrence of SS during ICU stay for patients admitted without such condition. While 28-day mortality did not differ between iEN and PN (15.6% vs. 15.1%), patients without SS who received iEN had fewer episodes of severe sepsis or septic shock (4.9% vs. 13.1%). ICU length of stay was 4 days shorter in patients given iEN. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to parenteral nutrition iEN appears to be beneficial in critical patients without severe sepsis or septic shock. Parenteral nutrition in these patients should be abandoned, at least when enteral nutrition can be administered, even at an initial low caloric content.
Authors: J Cohen; G Guyatt; G R Bernard; T Calandra; D Cook; D Elbourne; J Marshall; A Nunn; S Opal Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: G Iapichino; A Pesenti; D Radrizzani; M Solca; A Pelizzola; L Gattinoni Journal: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr Date: 1983 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Juan C Montejo; Teodoro Grau; Jose Acosta; Sergio Ruiz-Santana; Mercé Planas; Abelardo García-De-Lorenzo; Alfonso Mesejo; Manuel Cervera; Carmen Sánchez-Alvarez; Rafael Núñez-Ruiz; Jorge López-Martínez Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Peter Andrews; Elie Azoulay; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Daniel De Backer; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Jerôme Pugin; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Christian Richard Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-02-14 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Sara L Zettervall; Jeremy L Holzmacher; Michal Radomski; Matthew Skancke; Justin Shafa; Richard Amdur; Babak Sarani; Khashayar Vaziri Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-06-28 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: K Reinhart; F M Brunkhorst; H-G Bone; J Bardutzky; C-E Dempfle; H Forst; P Gastmeier; H Gerlach; M Gründling; S John; W Kern; G Kreymann; W Krüger; P Kujath; G Marggraf; J Martin; K Mayer; A Meier-Hellmann; M Oppert; C Putensen; M Quintel; M Ragaller; R Rossaint; H Seifert; C Spies; F Stüber; N Weiler; A Weimann; K Werdan; T Welte Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: Michael Zappitelli; Marisa Juarez; L Castillo; Jorge Coss-Bu; Stuart L Goldstein Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-01-29 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: K Reinhart; F M Brunkhorst; H-G Bone; J Bardutzky; C-E Dempfle; H Forst; P Gastmeier; H Gerlach; M Gründling; S John; W Kern; G Kreymann; W Krüger; P Kujath; G Marggraf; J Martin; K Mayer; A Meier-Hellmann; M Oppert; C Putensen; M Quintel; M Ragaller; R Rossaint; H Seifert; C Spies; F Stüber; N Weiler; A Weimann; K Werdan; T Welte Journal: Ger Med Sci Date: 2010-06-28
Authors: R P Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes; Djillali Annane; Herwig Gerlach; Steven M Opal; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Ivor S Douglas; Roman Jaeschke; Tiffany M Osborn; Mark E Nunnally; Sean R Townsend; Konrad Reinhart; Ruth M Kleinpell; Derek C Angus; Clifford S Deutschman; Flavia R Machado; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Steven Webb; Richard J Beale; Jean-Louis Vincent; Rui Moreno Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 17.440