Literature DB >> 16786524

Selective attention toward female secondary sexual color in male rhesus macaques.

Corri Waitt1, Melissa S Gerald, Anthony C Little, Edmundo Kraiselburd.   

Abstract

Pink-to-red anogenital and facial sexual skin occurs in females of many primate species. Since female sexual skin color varies with reproductive state, it has long been assumed that color acts to stimulate male sexual interest. Although there is supportive evidence for this as regards anogenital skin, it is unclear whether this is also the case for facial sexual skin. In this study we experimentally manipulated digital facial and hindquarter images of female rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) for color within the natural range of variation. The images were presented to adult male conspecifics to assess whether the males exhibited visual preferences for red vs. non-red female coloration, and whether preferences varied with anatomical region. The males displayed significantly longer gaze durations in response to reddened versions of female hindquarters, but not to reddened versions of faces. This suggests that female facial coloration may serve an alternative purpose to that of attracting males, and that the signal function of sexual skin and the intended recipients may vary across anatomical regions. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16786524     DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Primatol        ISSN: 0275-2565            Impact factor:   2.371


  33 in total

1.  A parameterized digital 3D model of the Rhesus macaque face for investigating the visual processing of social cues.

Authors:  Aidan P Murphy; David A Leopold
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Non-lactating versus lactating females: a comparison of sex steroids, sexual coloration, and sexual behavior in Japanese macaques.

Authors:  Bernard Wallner; Doris Aspernig; Eva Millesi; Ivo H Machatschke
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.163

3.  Who cares? Experimental attention biases provide new insights into a mammalian sexual signal.

Authors:  Constance Dubuc; William L Allen; Julie Cascio; D Susie Lee; Dario Maestripieri; Megan Petersdorf; Sandra Winters; James P Higham
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.671

4.  Monkey visual behavior falls into the uncanny valley.

Authors:  Shawn A Steckenfinger; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Familiarity affects the assessment of female facial signals of fertility by free-ranging male rhesus macaques.

Authors:  James P Higham; Kelly D Hughes; Lauren J N Brent; Constance Dubuc; Antje Engelhardt; Michael Heistermann; Dario Maestriperi; Laurie R Santos; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Surface color and predictability determine contextual modulation of V1 firing and gamma oscillations.

Authors:  Alina Peter; Cem Uran; Pascal Fries; Martin Vinck; Johanna Klon-Lipok; Rasmus Roese; Sylvia van Stijn; William Barnes; Jarrod R Dowdall; Wolf Singer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  The application of noninvasive, restraint-free eye-tracking methods for use with nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Lydia M Hopper; Roberto A Gulli; Lauren H Howard; Fumihiro Kano; Christopher Krupenye; Amy M Ryan; Annika Paukner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-06

9.  Do capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella) prefer symmetrical face shapes?

Authors:  Annika Paukner; Lauren J Wooddell; Carmen E Lefevre; Eric Lonsdorf; Elizabeth Lonsdorf
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Facial Skin Coloration Affects Perceived Health of Human Faces.

Authors:  Ian D Stephen; Miriam J Law Smith; Michael R Stirrat; David I Perrett
Journal:  Int J Primatol       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.