Literature DB >> 19822765

Monkey visual behavior falls into the uncanny valley.

Shawn A Steckenfinger1, Asif A Ghazanfar.   

Abstract

Very realistic human-looking robots or computer avatars tend to elicit negative feelings in human observers. This phenomenon is known as the "uncanny valley" response. It is hypothesized that this uncanny feeling is because the realistic synthetic characters elicit the concept of "human," but fail to live up to it. That is, this failure generates feelings of unease due to character traits falling outside the expected spectrum of everyday social experience. These unsettling emotions are thought to have an evolutionary origin, but tests of this hypothesis have not been forthcoming. To bridge this gap, we presented monkeys with unrealistic and realistic synthetic monkey faces, as well as real monkey faces, and measured whether they preferred looking at one type versus the others (using looking time as a measure of preference). To our surprise, monkey visual behavior fell into the uncanny valley: They looked longer at real faces and unrealistic synthetic faces than at realistic synthetic faces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19822765      PMCID: PMC2760490          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0910063106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  23 in total

1.  Evidence from rhesus macaques suggests that male coloration plays a role in female primate mate choice.

Authors:  Corri Waitt; Anthony C Little; Sarah Wolfensohn; Paul Honess; Anthony P Brown; Hannah M Buchanan-Smith; David I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Primate brains in the wild: the sensory bases for social interactions.

Authors:  Asif A Ghazanfar; Laurie R Santos
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Understanding animate agents: distinct roles for the social network and mirror system.

Authors:  Thalia Wheatley; Shawn C Milleville; Alex Martin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-06

4.  Facial-expression and gaze-selective responses in the monkey amygdala.

Authors:  Kari L Hoffman; Katalin M Gothard; Michael C Schmid; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Behavioral triggers of skin conductance responses and their neural correlates in the primate amygdala.

Authors:  Christopher M Laine; Kevin M Spitler; Clayton P Mosher; Katalin M Gothard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Interactions between the superior temporal sulcus and auditory cortex mediate dynamic face/voice integration in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Asif A Ghazanfar; Chandramouli Chandrasekaran; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces.

Authors:  Karl F MacDorman; Robert D Green; Chin-Chang Ho; Clinton T Koch
Journal:  Comput Human Behav       Date:  2009-05-01

8.  Mapping the contribution of single muscles to facial movements in the rhesus macaque.

Authors:  B M Waller; L A Parr; K M Gothard; A M Burrows; A J Fuglevand
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-05-13

9.  Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces.

Authors:  Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Can machines think? Interaction and perspective taking with robots investigated via fMRI.

Authors:  Sören Krach; Frank Hegel; Britta Wrede; Gerhard Sagerer; Ferdinand Binkofski; Tilo Kircher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  How does visuomotor priming differ for biological and non-biological stimuli? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  E Gowen; E Poliakoff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-07

2.  A parameterized digital 3D model of the Rhesus macaque face for investigating the visual processing of social cues.

Authors:  Aidan P Murphy; David A Leopold
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Dynamic faces speed up the onset of auditory cortical spiking responses during vocal detection.

Authors:  Chandramouli Chandrasekaran; Luis Lemus; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Facial expressions and the evolution of the speech rhythm.

Authors:  Asif A Ghazanfar; Daniel Y Takahashi
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Studying the visual brain in its natural rhythm.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Soo Hyun Park
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  The development of the uncanny valley in infants.

Authors:  David J Lewkowicz; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 3.038

Review 7.  The evolution of speech: vision, rhythm, cooperation.

Authors:  Asif A Ghazanfar; Daniel Y Takahashi
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Dynamic, rhythmic facial expressions and the superior temporal sulcus of macaque monkeys: implications for the evolution of audiovisual speech.

Authors:  Asif A Ghazanfar; Chandramouli Chandrasekaran; Ryan J Morrill
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Great apes' understanding of biomechanics: eye-tracking experiments using three-dimensional computer-generated animations.

Authors:  Yutaro Sato; Michiteru Kitazaki; Shoji Itakura; Tomoyo Morita; Yoko Sakuraba; Masaki Tomonaga; Satoshi Hirata
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 2.163

10.  Monkeys are perceptually tuned to facial expressions that exhibit a theta-like speech rhythm.

Authors:  Asif A Ghazanfar; Ryan J Morrill; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.