Literature DB >> 16786352

Exploring the mental number line: evidence from a dual-task paradigm.

Dana Müller1, Wolf Schwarz.   

Abstract

In a parity-judgment task smaller numbers are responded to faster with the left-hand key and vice versa for larger numbers (SNARC effect; Dehaene et al., in Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396, 1993). We used the psychological refractory period paradigm involving a parity-judgment task and tone-discrimination task to address the question at which stage this effect arises. When the parity-judgment task is performed second, then we found equal SNARC effects for the short and the long SOA. According to the central bottleneck model, this indicates that the effect arises during the response-selection or execution stage. In Experiment 2 the parity-judgment task was performed first. The pattern of results indicates that the SNARC effect originates during the perceptual encoding or response-selection. Together, our results suggest that the SNARC effect originates while the response is selected.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16786352     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-006-0070-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  34 in total

1.  A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing.

Authors:  R S McCann; R W Remington; M Van Selst
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: evidence from the SNARC effect.

Authors:  W Fias
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2001-11

Review 3.  A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance.

Authors:  Michael Tombu; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized.

Authors:  Wim Gevers; Bert Reynvoet; Wim Fias
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-04

5.  Moving the eyes along the mental number line: comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses.

Authors:  Wolf Schwarz; Inge M Keus
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-05

6.  Spatial associations in number-related tasks: A comparison of manual and pedal responses.

Authors:  Wolf Schwarz; Dana Müller
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2006

7.  The organization of brain activations in number comparison: event-related potentials and the additive-factors method.

Authors:  S Dehaene
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Magnitude versus parity in numerical judgements: event-related brain potentials implicate response conflict as the source of interference.

Authors:  L J Otten; P Sudevan; G D Logan; M G Coles
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1996-10

9.  Time required for judgements of numerical inequality.

Authors:  R S Moyer; T K Landauer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Parsing a cognitive task: a characterization of the mind's bottleneck.

Authors:  Mariano Sigman; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  3 in total

1.  Do Arabic numerals activate magnitude automatically? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.

Authors:  Natalie Ford; Michael G Reynolds
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

2.  On the importance of Task 1 and error performance measures in PRP dual-task studies.

Authors:  Tilo Strobach; Anja Schütz; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-07

3.  Pointing hand stimuli induce spatial compatibility effects and effector priming.

Authors:  Akio Nishimura; Chikashi Michimata
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.