Literature DB >> 16785848

Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T: problem or a promise for the future?

Shahid M Hussain1, Piotr A Wielopolski, Diego R Martin.   

Abstract

The development of transmit-receive body coils and local and phased-array radiofrequency receive coils for 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems, and their recent approval in Europe and North America has promoted a move toward higher field, whole-body MRI. With approximately double the signal-noise ratio of a 1.5-T system, 3.0-T MR systems can substantially improve image quality and image acquisition speed; 3.0 T can potentially deliver square root(2) improvement in resolution in the same acquisition time of a comparable study at 1.5 T or one-half slice thickness with identical coverage or 4-fold speedup in scanning time for identical resolution settings. Parallel imaging, multiple coil elements, specific absorption rate, and altered MR physical properties at 3.0 T (T1 relaxation times, susceptibility, T2*) are important issues during optimization of sequences at high field. Possible future applications in the abdomen include high-resolution, contrast-enhanced imaging of the liver and pancreas; MR angiography; and MR spectroscopy. In this article, we will present our initial experience with optimization of sequences for abdominal MRI at 3.0 T and will include a short description of parallel imaging because of its importance for imaging at 3.0 T, general remarks comparing some of the physical properties of 1.5 T and 3.0 T, and some of the challenges during sequence optimization for the abdomen at 3.0 T with examples of abdominal MRI at 3.0 T with 4- and 8-channel coils.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16785848     DOI: 10.1097/01.rmr.0000224689.06501.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0899-3459


  11 in total

1.  Local B1+ shimming for prostate imaging with transceiver arrays at 7T based on subject-dependent transmit phase measurements.

Authors:  Gregory J Metzger; Carl Snyder; Can Akgun; Tommy Vaughan; Kamil Ugurbil; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Correlation imaging for multiscan MRI with parallel data acquisition.

Authors:  Yu Li; Charles Dumoulin
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced 3.0 T MR imaging: quantitative and qualitative comparison of hepatocyte-phase images obtained 10 min and 20 min after injection for the detection of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Keitaro Sofue; Masakatsu Tsurusaki; Hiroyuki Tokue; Yasuaki Arai; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Detection of hepatic metastases by superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging: prospective comparison between 1.5-T and 3.0-T images in the same patients.

Authors:  Keitaro Sofue; Masakatsu Tsurusaki; Mototaka Miyake; Aine Sakurada; Yasuaki Arai; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced computed tomography with histopathological examinations for the identification of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter phase III study.

Authors:  Masakatsu Tsurusaki; Keitaro Sofue; Hiroyoshi Isoda; Masahiro Okada; Kazuhiro Kitajima; Takamichi Murakami
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 7.527

6.  Incremental value of magnetic resonance imaging in the advanced management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Liang Wang
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-31

7.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of benign prostatic tissue: findings at 3.0 T compared to 1.5 T-initial experience.

Authors:  Munish Chitkara; Antonio Westphalen; John Kurhanewicz; Aliya Qayyum; Liina Poder; Galen Reed; Fergus V Coakley
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.605

8.  Self-calibrated correlation imaging with k-space variant correlation functions.

Authors:  Yu Li; Masoud Edalati; Xingfu Du; Hui Wang; Jie J Cao
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic MR imaging and contrast-enhanced computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Asato; Masakatsu Tsurusaki; Keitaro Sofue; Yoko Hieda; Takashi Katsube; Kazuhiro Kitajima; Takamichi Murakami
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.374

10.  Hepatic fat and adenosine triphosphate measurement in overweight and obese adults using 1H and 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Steven F Solga; Alena Horska; Susanne Hemker; Stephen Crawford; Charalett Diggs; Anna Mae Diehl; Frederick L Brancati; Jeanne M Clark
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 5.828

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.