Literature DB >> 16782320

Relative responsiveness of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire, St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire and four other health-related quality of life instruments for patients with chronic lung disease.

Milo A Puhan1, Gordon H Guyatt, Roger Goldstein, Jeff Mador, Douglas McKim, Elisabeth Stahl, Lauren Griffith, Holger J Schünemann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Selection of heath-related quality of life (HRQL) instruments that are most responsive to changes in HRQL prevents investigators from drawing false-negative conclusions about the effectiveness of an intervention. The objective of this study was to compare the responsiveness of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ), the St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and four other HRQL instruments.
METHODS: We enrolled 177 patients with chronic lung disease, primarily COPD (93%), who completed 8 weeks of respiratory rehabilitation. Patients completed the CRQ, the SGRQ and four generic measures (SF-36, Feeling Thermometer, Standard Gamble and Health Utilities index 3) at the beginning of the rehabilitation program and 12 weeks thereafter. We calculated standardized response means (SRMs) for each instrument, from the change score divided by the standard deviation of the change score.
RESULTS: We observed the largest SRM for the CRQ (0.24-0.66 for the four CRQ domains on the interviewer-administered and 0.56-0.84 for the self-administered format) and the SGRQ (0.33-0.51 for the three SGRQ domains and total score). The CRQ dyspnea domain was statistically significantly more responsive than any other instrument including the SGRQ. For the SGRQ, the total and impacts domain were significantly more responsive than the generic and preference-based instruments.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that the CRQ and SGRQ are substantially more responsive than generic measures, and suggests particularly strong responsiveness for the self-administered CRQ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16782320     DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.04.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Med        ISSN: 0954-6111            Impact factor:   3.415


  34 in total

1.  The minimal important difference in the 6-minute walk test for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Stephen C Mathai; Milo A Puhan; Diana Lam; Robert A Wise
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Outcomes in Cardiopulmonary Physical Therapy: Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ).

Authors:  Alyssa Chauvin; Laurel Rupley; Katie Meyers; Kristin Johnson; Jane Eason
Journal:  Cardiopulm Phys Ther J       Date:  2008-06

3.  Examining the efficacy of DVD technology compared to print-based material in COPD self-management education of rural patients.

Authors:  Michael Stellefson; Beth H Chaney; J Don Chaney
Journal:  Calif J Health Promot       Date:  2009-12

4.  The Effect of Breathing Retraining Using Metronome-Based Acoustic Feedback on Exercise Endurance in COPD: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Eileen G Collins; Christine Jelinek; Susan O'Connell; Jolene Butler; Domenic Reda; Franco Laghi
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 2.584

5.  Factors associated with quality of life measured by EQ-5D in patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Ji Young Hong; Sang A Lee; Song Yee Kim; Kyung Soo Chung; Sung Woo Moon; Eun Young Kim; Ji Ye Jung; Moo Suk Park; Young Sam Kim; Se Kyu Kim; Joon Chang; Young Ae Kang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Improving the interpretation of quality of life evidence in meta-analyses: the application of minimal important difference units.

Authors:  Bradley C Johnston; Kristian Thorlund; Holger J Schünemann; Feng Xie; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Victor M Montori; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Impact of impairment and secondary health conditions on health preference among Canadians with chronic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Catharine Craven; Sander L Hitzig; Nicole Mittmann
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 8.  Self-efficacy instruments for patients with chronic diseases suffer from methodological limitations--a systematic review.

Authors:  Anja Frei; Anna Svarin; Claudia Steurer-Stey; Milo A Puhan
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 9.  Outcome measures in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): strengths and limitations.

Authors:  Thomas Glaab; Claus Vogelmeier; Roland Buhl
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2010-06-17

10.  Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a new short Visual Simplified Respiratory Questionnaire (VSRQ) for health-related quality of life assessment in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  T Perez; B Arnould; J-M Grosbois; V Bosch; I Guillemin; M-L Bravo; M Brun; A-B Tonnel
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2009-04-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.