Literature DB >> 16779027

The effects and quality of IT evaluation studies: Trends in 1982 - 2002.

Nicolette de Keizer1, Elske Ammenwerth.   

Abstract

During the last years the significance of evaluation studies as well as the interest in adequate methods and approaches for evaluation has grown in medical informatics. In order to put this discussion into historical perspective of evaluation research, we conducted a systematic review on trends in evaluation research of information technology in health care from 1982 to 2002. In a first step of our inventory, we concentrated on describing long-term developments e.g. in study questions and methods used of IT evaluation studies as described in the abstracts of the identified 1.035 publications. In the second step of our inventory, we now analysed 64 randomly selected full papers on evaluation studies, in order to answer two questions: Did IT evaluation studies show a positive effect of IT on quality of processes or outcome quality of patient care, and how did the quality of evaluation studies themselves develop in the last 20 years. Appropriateness of the care process was the most common and mostly positively evaluated aspect. There was a trend towards more multi-centre studies. The quality of the studies remained stable over time. Randomized controlled trials had significantly higher quality than non-RCT studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16779027      PMCID: PMC1560570     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  16 in total

1.  Health informatics as a tool to improve quality in non-acute care--new opportunities and a matching need for a new evaluation paradigm.

Authors:  M Rigby
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Developing and evaluating criteria to help reviewers of biomedical informatics manuscripts.

Authors:  Elske Ammenwerth; Astrid C Wolff; Petra Knaup; Hanno Ulmer; Stefan Skonetzki; Jan H van Bemmel; Alexa T McCray; Reinhold Haux; Casimir Kulikowski
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-06-04       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems. Reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck.

Authors:  Elske Ammenwerth; Jytte Brender; Pirkko Nykänen; Hans-Ulrich Prokosch; Michael Rigby; Jan Talmon
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 4.  Outcomes and methods in telemedicine evaluation.

Authors:  Noriaki Aoki; Kim Dunn; Kathy A Johnson-Throop; James P Turley
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.536

5.  An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care trends in evaluation research 1982-2002.

Authors:  E Ammenwerth; N de Keizer
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.176

6.  Clinical research in general medical journals: a 30-year perspective.

Authors:  R H Fletcher; S W Fletcher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-07-26       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A plea for controlled trials in medical informatics.

Authors:  W M Tierney; J M Overhage; C J McDonald
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 8.  Evaluating informatics applications--some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism.

Authors:  B Kaplan
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 9.  The effects of promoting patient access to medical records: a review.

Authors:  Stephen E Ross; Chen-Tan Lin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research.

Authors:  M E Johnston; K B Langton; R B Haynes; A Mathieu
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Informatics systems to promote improved care for chronic illness: a literature review.

Authors:  David Dorr; Laura M Bonner; Amy N Cohen; Rebecca S Shoai; Ruth Perrin; Edmund Chaney; Alexander S Young
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.497

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.