OBJECTIVE: Changes in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in a tumor and peritumoral tissue after stereotactic irradiation (STI) were evaluated, and then the therapeutic efficacy of ADC measurement was assessed. METHODS: In 20 tumors, diffusion-weighted imaging within 1 week before and 2-4 weeks after STI was performed. The normalized ADC (nADC) was measured. The nADCs in the tumor and peritumoral region before STI were compared with those after STI and the change in tumor nADC compared with the change in tumor size. RESULTS: The nADC of the tumors was significantly higher 2-4 weeks after STI compared with that before STI. The nADC of the peritumoral regions 2-4 weeks after STI did not differ significantly from that before STI. A significant difference in the nADC at 2-4 weeks after STI was observed between the responder and nonresponder groups. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in nADC as measured by diffusion-weighted imaging can predict response to STI.
OBJECTIVE: Changes in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in a tumor and peritumoral tissue after stereotactic irradiation (STI) were evaluated, and then the therapeutic efficacy of ADC measurement was assessed. METHODS: In 20 tumors, diffusion-weighted imaging within 1 week before and 2-4 weeks after STI was performed. The normalized ADC (nADC) was measured. The nADCs in the tumor and peritumoral region before STI were compared with those after STI and the change in tumornADC compared with the change in tumor size. RESULTS: The nADC of the tumors was significantly higher 2-4 weeks after STI compared with that before STI. The nADC of the peritumoral regions 2-4 weeks after STI did not differ significantly from that before STI. A significant difference in the nADC at 2-4 weeks after STI was observed between the responder and nonresponder groups. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in nADC as measured by diffusion-weighted imaging can predict response to STI.
Authors: Craig J Galbán; Stefanie Galbán; Marcian E Van Dort; Gary D Luker; Mahaveer S Bhojani; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross Journal: Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci Date: 2010 Impact factor: 3.622
Authors: Inas S Khayal; Mei-Yin C Polley; Llewellyn Jalbert; Adam Elkhaled; Susan M Chang; Soonmee Cha; Nicholas A Butowski; Sarah J Nelson Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2010-05-25 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Benjamin Lewis; Anamaria Guta; Stacie Mackey; H Michael Gach; Sasa Mutic; Olga Green; Taeho Kim Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Young Jin Heo; Ji Eun Park; Ho Sung Kim; Ji Ye Lee; Soo Jeong Nam; Seung Chai Jung; Choong Gon Choi; Sang Joon Kim Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Nathan S White; Carrie McDonald; Carrie R McDonald; Niky Farid; Josh Kuperman; David Karow; Natalie M Schenker-Ahmed; Hauke Bartsch; Rebecca Rakow-Penner; Dominic Holland; Ahmed Shabaik; Atle Bjørnerud; Tuva Hope; Jona Hattangadi-Gluth; Michael Liss; J Kellogg Parsons; Clark C Chen; Steve Raman; Daniel Margolis; Robert E Reiter; Leonard Marks; Santosh Kesari; Arno J Mundt; Christopher J Kane; Christopher J Kaine; Bob S Carter; William G Bradley; Anders M Dale Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2014-09-01 Impact factor: 12.701