Literature DB >> 18855990

Effect of b value on monitoring therapeutic response by diffusion-weighted imaging.

Zhao-Xia Jiang1, Wei-Jun Peng, Wen-Tao Li, Feng Tang, Shi-Yuan Liu, Xu-Dong Qu, Jian-Hua Wang, Hong-Feng Lu.   

Abstract

AIM: To explore the diffusion gradient b-factor that optimizes both apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement and contrast-to-noise (CNR) for assessing tumor response to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in a rabbit model.
METHODS: Twelve New Zealand white rabbits bearing VX2 tumors in the liver were treated with TACE. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with various b values was performed using the same protocol before and 3 d after treatment with TACE. ADC values and CNR of each tumor pre- and post-treatment with different b factors were analyzed. Correlation between ADC values and extent of necrosis in histological specimens was analyzed by a Pearson's correlation test.
RESULTS: The quality of diffusion-weighted images diminished as the b value increased. A substantial decrease in the mean lesion-to-liver CNR was observed on both pre- and post-treatment DW images, the largest difference in CNR pre- and post-treatment was manifested at a b value of 1000 s/mm(2) (P = 0.036 ). The effect of therapy on diffusion early after treatment was shown by a significant increase in ADCs (P = 0.007), especially with large b factors (>= 600 s/mm(2)). The mean percentage of necrotic cells present within the tumor was 76.3%-97.5%. A significant positive correlation was found between ADC values and the extent of necrosis with all b values except for b200, a higher relative coefficient between ADC values and percentage of necrosis was found on DWI with b1000 and b2000 (P = 0.002 and 0.006, respectively).
CONCLUSION: An increasing b value of up to 600 s/mm(2) would increase ADC contrast pre- and post-treatment, but decrease image quality. Taking into account both CNR and ADC measurement, diffusion-weighted imaging obtained with a b value of 1000 s/mm(2) is recommended for monitoring early hepatic tumor response to TACE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18855990      PMCID: PMC2751901          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.5893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  30 in total

1.  Burst excitation for quantitative diffusion imaging with multiple b-values.

Authors:  C A Wheeler-Kingshott; D L Thomas; M F Lythgoe; D Guilfoyle; S R Williams; S J Doran
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Evaluation of the therapeutic effect of transcatheter arterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  T Okusaka; S Okada; H Ueno; M Ikeda; M Yoshimori; K Shimada; J Yamamoto; T Kosuge; S Yamasaki; R Iwata; H Furukawa; N Moriyama; M Sakamoto; S Hirohashi
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.935

3.  Chemoembolization of liver tumor in a rabbit model: assessment of tumor cell death with diffusion-weighted MR imaging and histologic analysis.

Authors:  J F Geschwind; D Artemov; S Abraham; D Omdal; M S Huncharek; C McGee; A Arepally; D Lambert; A C Venbrux; G B Lund
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term results of combined treatment with laser thermal ablation and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  C M Pacella; G Bizzarri; P Cecconi; B Caspani; F Magnolfi; A Bianchini; V Anelli; S Pacella; Z Rossi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of tumor recurrencies and posttherapeutical soft-tissue changes in humans.

Authors:  A Baur; A Huber; S Arbogast; H R Dürr; S Zysk; C Wendtner; M Deimling; M Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Measurement of cell density and necrotic fraction in human melanoma xenografts by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  H Lyng; O Haraldseth; E K Rofstad
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Apparent diffusion coefficient: a quantitative parameter for in vivo tumor characterization.

Authors:  Andreas M Herneth; Samira Guccione; Mark Bednarski
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Diffusion MRI for prediction of response of rectal cancer to chemoradiation.

Authors:  Andrzej Dzik-Jurasz; Claudia Domenig; Mark George; Jan Wolber; Anwar Padhani; Gina Brown; Simon Doran
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-07-27       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Evaluation of liver diffusion isotropy and characterization of focal hepatic lesions with two single-shot echo-planar MR imaging sequences: prospective study in 66 patients.

Authors:  Bachir Taouli; Valérie Vilgrain; Erik Dumont; Jean-Luc Daire; Bo Fan; Yves Menu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Douglas E Ramsey; Lily Y Kernagis; Michael C Soulen; Jean-Francois H Geschwind
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.464

View more
  4 in total

1.  Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Xing-Yu Cui; Hong-Wei Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Advanced imaging techniques in the therapeutic response of transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ke Yang; Xiao-Ming Zhang; Lin Yang; Hao Xu; Juan Peng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for tumour response assessment: why, when and how?

Authors:  A Afaq; A Andreou; D M Koh
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

4.  CT Perfusion Imaging Can Predict Patients' Survival and Early Response to Transarterial Chemo-Lipiodol Infusion for Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancers.

Authors:  Wei-Fu Lv; Jian-Kui Han; De-Lei Cheng; Chun-Ze Zhou; Ming Ni; Dong Lu
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.500

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.