Literature DB >> 16778106

Phase 1 and pharmacokinetic study of intravenous irinotecan in refractory solid tumor patients with hepatic dysfunction.

Larry J Schaaf1, Lisa A Hammond, Stuart J Tipping, Richard M Goldberg, Rakesh Goel, John G Kuhn, Langdon L Miller, Linda D Compton, Laura A Cisar, Gary L Elfring, Gabriela Gruia, J Patrick McGovren, Nicoletta Pirotta, Donghua Yin, Amarnath Sharma, Barbara A Duncan, Mace L Rothenberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the recommended starting doses and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan in cancer patients with impaired liver function treated on a weekly schedule. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Patients with solid tumors who had impaired liver function were enrolled into four groups based on baseline serum total bilirubin and aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT): Group 1 (n = 19): total bilirubin 1.5 to 3.0 x institutional upper limit of normal (IULN) and ALT/AST <or=5.0 x IULN; Group 2 (n = 7): total bilirubin 3.1 to 5.0 x IULN and ALT/AST <or=5.0 x IULN; Group 3 (n = 6): total bilirubin <or=1.5 x IULN and ALT/AST 5.1 to 20.0 x IULN; Group 4 (n = 10): total bilirubin 1.5 to 3.0 x IULN and ALT/AST 5.1 to 20.0 x IULN. Irinotecan was given as a 90-minute i.v. infusion weekly for the first 4 weeks in each 6-week cycle at starting doses which escalated from 40 to as much as 75 mg/m(2). After the first treatment, doses were adjusted based on individual patient toxicities. Starting doses for patients with hepatic dysfunction were derived from the maximum tolerated doses noted in the four hepatic dysfunction groups.
RESULTS: Forty-two patients were treated. Among the most frequent adverse events were neutropenia (41%, grades 3/4), diarrhea (15%, grades 3/4), nausea (10%, grade 3), and vomiting (5%, grades 3/4). Two patients died from drug-induced neutropenic sepsis. Two patients had objective tumor responses (complete response, liver metastases from unknown primary; partial response, colon cancer). Hepatic dysfunction reduced irinotecan clearance while increasing relative exposure to the active metabolite, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38). SN-38 exposures in patients receiving doses of 40 to 75 mg/m(2) were comparable to exposures in patients with normal liver function treated with a starting dose of 125 mg/m(2).
CONCLUSIONS: Irinotecan starting doses that seem to be safe for hepatically impaired patients treated with the weekly schedule are 60, 50, 60, and 40 mg/m(2) for groups 1 to 4, respectively. At these starting doses, exposure to SN-38 and the adverse event profile are similar to that observed in patients with normal liver function and antitumor activity can be observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16778106     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  11 in total

Review 1.  Liposomal Irinotecan: A Review in Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yvette N Lamb; Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of trabectedin 3-hour infusion every three weeks in patients with advanced cancer and alteration of hepatic function.

Authors:  Beatriz Pardo; Ramón Salazar; Eva Ciruelos; Hernán Cortés-Funes; Margarita García; Margarita Majem; Ana Montes; Carmen Cuadra; Arturo Soto-Matos; Claudia Lebedinsky; Vicente Alfaro; Luis Paz-Ares
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  Chemotherapy in patients with hepatobiliary cancers and abnormal hepatic function.

Authors:  Jun Gong; May Cho; Marwan Fakih
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-04

4.  Population pharmacokinetic analysis of AR-67, a lactone stable camptothecin analogue, in cancer patients with solid tumors.

Authors:  Fei Tang; Eleftheria Tsakalozou; Susanne M Arnold; Chee M Ng; Markos Leggas
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Impaired irinotecan biotransformation in hepatic microsomal fractions from patients with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Fabrizio d'Esposito; Noelia Nebot; Robert J Edwards; Michael Murray
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Compartmentalized accumulation of cAMP near complexes of multidrug resistance protein 4 (MRP4) and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) contributes to drug-induced diarrhea.

Authors:  Changsuk Moon; Weiqiang Zhang; Aixia Ren; Kavisha Arora; Chandrima Sinha; Sunitha Yarlagadda; Koryse Woodrooffe; John D Schuetz; Koteswara Rao Valasani; Hugo R de Jonge; Shiva Kumar Shanmukhappa; Mohamed Tarek M Shata; Randal K Buddington; Kaushik Parthasarathi; Anjaparavanda P Naren
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Optimal Sampling Strategies for Irinotecan (CPT-11) and its Active Metabolite (SN-38) in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Spinel Karas; Amy S Etheridge; Eleftheria Tsakalozou; Jacqueline Ramírez; Erika Cecchin; Ron H N van Schaik; Giuseppe Toffoli; Mark J Ratain; Ron H J Mathijssen; Alan Forrest; Robert R Bies; Federico Innocenti
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 8.  Irinotecan, a key chemotherapeutic drug for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ken-ichi Fujita; Yutaro Kubota; Hiroo Ishida; Yasutsuna Sasaki
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Cancer and liver cirrhosis: implications on prognosis and management.

Authors:  Matthias Pinter; Michael Trauner; Markus Peck-Radosavljevic; Wolfgang Sieghart
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2016-03-17

10.  Colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases and severe hyperbilirubinemia: A consecutive series that explores the benefits and risks of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Tamana Walia; J Fernando Quevedo; Timothy J Hobday; Gary Croghan; Aminah Jatoi
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.