Literature DB >> 32185579

Optimal Sampling Strategies for Irinotecan (CPT-11) and its Active Metabolite (SN-38) in Cancer Patients.

Spinel Karas1, Amy S Etheridge1, Eleftheria Tsakalozou1, Jacqueline Ramírez2, Erika Cecchin3, Ron H N van Schaik4, Giuseppe Toffoli3, Mark J Ratain2, Ron H J Mathijssen5, Alan Forrest1, Robert R Bies6,7, Federico Innocenti8.   

Abstract

Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an anticancer agent widely used in the treatment of a variety of adult solid tumors. The objective of this study was to develop an optimal sampling strategy model that accurately estimates pharmacokinetic parameters of CPT-11 and its active metabolite, SN-38. This study included 221 patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma receiving CPT-11 single or combination therapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) (FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab from 4 separate clinical trials. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of CPT-11 and SN-38 was performed by non-linear mixed effects modeling. The optimal sampling strategy model was developed using D-optimality with expected distribution approach. The pharmacokinetic profiles of CPT-11 and SN-38 were best described by a 3- and 2-compartment model, respectively, with first-order elimination. Body surface area and co-administration with 5-FU/LV plus bevacizumab were significant covariates (p < 0.01) for volumes of the central compartment of CPT-11 and SN-38, and clearance of CPT-11. Pre-treatment total bilirubin and co-administration with 5-FU/LV and bevacizumab were significant covariates (p < 0.01) for clearance of SN-38. Accurate and precise predictive performance (r2 > 0.99, -2 < bias (%ME) < 0, precision (% RMSE) < 12) of both CPT-11 and SN-38 was achieved using: (i) 6 fixed sampling times collected at 1.5, 3.5, 4, 5.75, 22, 23.5 hours post-infusion; or (ii) 1 fixed time and 2 sampling windows collected at 1.5, [3-5.75], [22-23.5] hours post-infusion. The present study demonstrates that an optimal sampling design with three blood samples achieves accurate and precise pharmacokinetic parameter estimates for both CPT-11 and SN-38.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SN-38; irinotecan (CPT-11); limited sampling; optimal sampling strategy; population pharmacokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32185579     DOI: 10.1208/s12248-020-0429-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  49 in total

1.  Irinotecan dosing: does the CPT in CPT-11 stand for "Can't Predict Toxicity"?

Authors:  Mark J Ratain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Comprehensive analysis of UGT1A polymorphisms predictive for pharmacokinetics and treatment outcome in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with irinotecan and cisplatin.

Authors:  Ji-Youn Han; Hyeong-Seok Lim; Eun Soon Shin; Yeon-Kyeong Yoo; Yong Hoon Park; Jong-Eun Lee; In-Jin Jang; Dae Ho Lee; Jin Soo Lee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  PopED: an extended, parallelized, nonlinear mixed effects models optimal design tool.

Authors:  Joakim Nyberg; Sebastian Ueckert; Eric A Strömberg; Stefanie Hennig; Mats O Karlsson; Andrew C Hooker
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Sparse-data set analysis for irinotecan and SN-38 pharmacokinetics in cancer patients co-treated with cisplatin.

Authors:  R H Mathijssen; R J van Alphen; M J de Jonge; J Verweij; P de Bruijn; W J Loos; K Nooter; L Vernillet; G Stoter; A Sparreboom
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.248

5.  UGT1A1*28 polymorphism as a determinant of irinotecan disposition and toxicity.

Authors:  L Iyer; S Das; L Janisch; M Wen; J Ramírez; T Karrison; G F Fleming; E E Vokes; R L Schilsky; M J Ratain
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.550

6.  Phase III comparison of two irinotecan dosing regimens in second-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Charles S Fuchs; Melvin R Moore; Graydon Harker; Luis Villa; David Rinaldi; J Randolph Hecht
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites: a population analysis.

Authors:  Rujia Xie; Ron H J Mathijssen; Alex Sparreboom; Jaap Verweij; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Irinotecan pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and UGT1A genetic polymorphisms in Japanese: roles of UGT1A1*6 and *28.

Authors:  Hironobu Minami; Kimie Sai; Mayumi Saeki; Yoshiro Saito; Shogo Ozawa; Kazuhiro Suzuki; Nahoko Kaniwa; Jun-ichi Sawada; Tetsuya Hamaguchi; Noboru Yamamoto; Kuniaki Shirao; Yasuhide Yamada; Hironobu Ohmatsu; Kaoru Kubota; Teruhiko Yoshida; Atsushi Ohtsu; Nagahiro Saijo
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  An effective approach for obtaining optimal sampling windows for population pharmacokinetic experiments.

Authors:  Kayode Ogungbenro; Leon Aarons
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 10.  Individualization of Irinotecan Treatment: A Review of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacogenetics.

Authors:  Femke M de Man; Andrew K L Goey; Ron H N van Schaik; Ron H J Mathijssen; Sander Bins
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.