Literature DB >> 16776058

Function transformation without reinforcement.

Franćois Tonneau1, Fara Arreola, Alma Gabriela Martínez.   

Abstract

In studies of function transformation, participants initially are taught to match stimuli in the presence of a contextual cue, X; the stimuli to be matched bear some formal relation to each other, for example, a relation of opposition or difference. In a second phase, the participants are taught to match arbitrary stimuli (say, A and B) in the presence of X. In a final test, A often displays behavioral functions that differ from those of B, and can be predicted from the nature of the relation associated with X in the initial training phase. Here we report function-transformation effects in the absence of selection responses and of their reinforcers. In three experiments with college students, exposure to relations of difference or identity modified the responses given to later stimuli. In Experiment 1, responses to a test stimulus A varied depending on preexposure to pairs of colors that were distinct from A but exemplified relations of difference or identity. In Experiment 2, a stimulus A acquired distinct functions, depending on its previous pairing with a contextual cue X that had itself been paired with identity or difference among colors. Experiment 3 confirmed the results of Experiment 2 with a modified design. Our data are consistent with the notion that relations of identity or difference can serve as stimuli for Pavlovian processes, and, in compound with other cues, produce apparent function-transformation effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16776058      PMCID: PMC1459850          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2006.49-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  26 in total

1.  Associative changes with a random CS-US relationship.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2000-11

2.  Function transfer in human operant experiments: the role of stimulus pairings.

Authors:  François Tonneau; Carmen González
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choice based on exclusion in pigeons.

Authors:  Tricia S Clement; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

4.  The transformation of consequential functions in accordance with the relational frames of same and opposite.

Authors:  Robert Whelan; Dermot Barnes-Holmes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Understanding complex behavior: the transformation of stimulus functions.

Authors:  S Dymond; R A Rehfeldt
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2000

6.  Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes.

Authors:  E Wulfert; S C Hayes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Nonhuman short-term memory: A quantitative reanalysis of selected findings.

Authors:  J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Formation of a novel preference and aversion by simultaneous activation of the representations of absent cues.

Authors:  D M Dwyer
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2000-03-14       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Time as content in Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  H I Savastano; R R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Acquisition and retention in short-term memory.

Authors:  D A Norman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-09
View more
  5 in total

1.  Evaluating the evidence base for relational frame theory: a citation analysis.

Authors:  Simon Dymond; Richard J May; Anita Munnelly; Alice E Hoon
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2010

2.  Semantic false memories in the form of derived relational intrusions following training.

Authors:  Paul M Guinther; Michael J Dougher
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  New knowledge derived from learned knowledge: functional-anatomic correlates of stimulus equivalence.

Authors:  Michael W Schlund; Rudolf Hoehn-Saric; Michael F Cataldo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Emergent stimulus relations depend on stimulus correlation and not on reinforcement contingencies.

Authors:  Sara Tepaeru Minster; Douglas Elliffe; Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Stimuli with identical contextual functions taught independently become functionally equivalent.

Authors:  Luis Antonio Pérez-González; Elvira Díaz; Silvia Fernández-García; Cristina Baizán
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.986

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.