Literature DB >> 15357508

Function transfer in human operant experiments: the role of stimulus pairings.

François Tonneau1, Carmen González.   

Abstract

Although function transfer often has been studied in complex operant procedures (such as matching to sample), whether operant reinforcement actually produces function transfer in such settings has not been established. The present experiments, with high school students as subjects, suggest that stimulus pairings can promote function transfer in conditions that closely approximate those of matching to sample. In Experiment 1, the subjects showed transfer of operant responding from three geometric figures (C1, C2, C3) to three colored shapes (B1, B2, B3) when the latter were paired with the former. Experiment 2 involved two groups of subjects. In the matching group, subjects matched the colored shapes with the geometric figures; in the yoked group, the shapes were merely paired with the geometric figures, and the schedule of stimulus pairing was yoked to the performance of the subjects in the matching group. Both groups of subjects showed function transfer. Experiment 3 documented function transfer from C stimuli to B stimuli through indirect stimulus pairings (A-B, A-C). In Experiment 4, function transfer was obtained even though the subjects vocalized continuously during the pairing trials, presumably preventing covert verbalization that might mediate transfer effects. Our results are consistent with a Pavlovian account and raise difficulties for current operant theories of function transfer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15357508      PMCID: PMC1284983          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2004.81-239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  21 in total

Review 1.  Categorization, concept learning, and behavior analysis: an introduction.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Mark Galizio; Thomas S Critchfied
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Reflections on naming and other symbolic behavior.

Authors:  C F Lowe; P J Horne
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Extending sequence-class membership with matching to sample.

Authors:  R Lazar
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Functional classes and equivalence relations.

Authors:  M Sidman; C K Wynne; R W Maguire; T Barnes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The orienting response as an index of stimulus associability in rats.

Authors:  J A Swan; J M Pearce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1988-07

6.  The strength of the orienting response during Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  H Kaye; J M Pearce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1984-01

7.  Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm.

Authors:  M Sidman; W Tailby
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 8.  Why behavior analysts should study emotion: the example of anxiety.

Authors:  P C Friman; S C Hayes; K G Wilson
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998

9.  Stability of emergent simple discriminations in young children.

Authors:  P M Smeets
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1994-06

10.  On the role of covarying functions in stimulus class formation and transfer of function.

Authors:  Rebecca G Markham; Michael R Markham
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  6 in total

1.  Function transformation without reinforcement.

Authors:  Franćois Tonneau; Fara Arreola; Alma Gabriela Martínez
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Stimulus equivalence: testing Sidman's (2000) theory.

Authors:  Sara Tepaeru Minster; Max Jones; Douglas Elliffe; Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A derived transfer of simple discrimination and self-reported arousal functions in spider fearful and non-spider-fearful participants.

Authors:  Sinéad Smyth; Dermot Barnes-Holmes; John P Forsyth
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Using action dynamics to assess competing stimulus control during stimulus equivalence testing.

Authors:  Denis P O'Hora; Ian T Tyndall; Mairéad McMorrow; Rick A C Dale
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Emergent stimulus relations depend on stimulus correlation and not on reinforcement contingencies.

Authors:  Sara Tepaeru Minster; Douglas Elliffe; Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Stimuli with identical contextual functions taught independently become functionally equivalent.

Authors:  Luis Antonio Pérez-González; Elvira Díaz; Silvia Fernández-García; Cristina Baizán
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.986

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.