Literature DB >> 16775669

The role of socioeconomic status on hip fracture.

D S Zingmond1, N F Soohoo, S L Silverman.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The impact of socioeconomic status-income and acculturation-on hip fracture is not well understood. We studied 116,919 fractures among 8,144,469 people in California. Greater income and English fluency predict lower fracture incidence. Lower income and immigrant populations are at increased risk for hip fracture and require intervention. Race/ethnicity is a major determinant of hip fracture risk. Although socioeconomic status (e.g., income and acculturation) is often associated with race/ethnicity, its impact on hip fracture incidence is less well understood.
METHODS: We carried out a retrospective, population-based, study of persons with hip fractures in California, 1996 to 2000, compared to census estimates by zip code. We performed Poisson regression analyses to calculate hip fracture incident rate ratios for gender, age, race/ethnicity, income, language (percent non-English speakers)-a proxy for acculturation-and living in rural areas.
RESULTS: During the 5-year period, 116,919 fractures occurred among 8,144,469 persons (2.87 fractures/1,000 persons per year). Higher income predicted lower hip fracture incidence. Persons in the highest decile of estimated income had an incident rate ratio (IRR) of 0.79 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 0.82) compared with those in the lowest decile. Greater IRR of hip fracture was predicted for persons living in areas with a greater percent of non-English speakers (IRR 1.004, 95% CI 1.003 to 1.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Low income and language fluency are predictors of greater hip fracture incidence. Although much attention is given to the aging of the "baby boomers", low income and immigrant populations are at increased risk for hip fracture and require intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16775669     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-006-0161-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  27 in total

1.  Socioeconomic influences on bone health in postmenopausal women: findings from NHANES III, 1988-1994.

Authors:  May-Choo Wang; L Beth Dixon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The effect of socioeconomic status on bone density in a male Caucasian population.

Authors:  J R Elliot; N L Gilchrist; J E Wells
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Race/ethnicity, social class and their relation to physical inactivity during leisure time: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994.

Authors:  C J Crespo; E Smit; R E Andersen; O Carter-Pokras; B E Ainsworth
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Incidence of hip fracture in western Sweden 1974-1982. Comparison of rural and urban populations.

Authors:  S Mannius; D Mellström; A Odén; A Rundgren; C Zetterberg
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1987-02

Review 5.  Conceptualizing and categorizing race and ethnicity in health services research.

Authors:  Marvella E Ford; P Adam Kelly
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Summary health statistics for the U.S. population: National Health Interview Survey, 2003.

Authors:  Jeannine S Schiller; Patricia F Adams; Zakia Coriaty Nelson
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 10       Date:  2005-04

7.  Fracture rates lower in rural than urban communities: the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  K M Sanders; G C Nicholson; A M Ugoni; E Seeman; J A Pasco; M A Kotowicz
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 8.  Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  All-cause and cause-specific mortality by socioeconomic status among employed persons in 27 US states, 1984-1997.

Authors:  Kyle Steenland; Sherry Hu; James Walker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Validation of a combined comorbidity index.

Authors:  M Charlson; T P Szatrowski; J Peterson; J Gold
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  27 in total

1.  Physician tiering by health plans in Massachusetts.

Authors:  Ajay D Wadgaonkar; Eric C Schneider; Timothy Bhattacharyya
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Is lower income associated with an increased likelihood of qualification for treatment for osteoporosis in Canadian women?

Authors:  S L Brennan; W D Leslie; L M Lix
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Associations between adverse social position and bone mineral density in women aged 50 years or older: data from the Manitoba Bone Density Program.

Authors:  S L Brennan; W D Leslie; L M Lix
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Socioeconomic status in relation to incident fracture risk in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation.

Authors:  C J Crandall; W Han; G A Greendale; T Seeman; P Tepper; R Thurston; C Karvonen-Gutierrez; A S Karlamangla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Education, marital status, and risk of hip fractures in older men and women: the CHANCES project.

Authors:  V Benetou; P Orfanos; D Feskanich; K Michaëlsson; U Pettersson-Kymmer; L A Ahmed; A Peasey; A Wolk; H Brenner; M Bobak; T Wilsgaard; B Schöttker; K-U Saum; A Bellavia; F Grodstein; E Klinaki; E Valanou; E-M Papatesta; P Boffetta; A Trichopoulou
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Socioeconomic status and bone health in community-dwelling older men: the CHAMP Study.

Authors:  I Nabipour; R Cumming; D J Handelsman; M Litchfield; V Naganathan; L Waite; H Creasey; M Janu; D Le Couteur; P N Sambrook; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Sex- and age-specific associations between income and incident major osteoporotic fractures in Canadian men and women: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  S L Brennan; L Yan; L M Lix; S N Morin; S R Majumdar; W D Leslie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Lower prevalence of hip fractures in foreign-born individuals than in Swedish-born individuals during the period 1987-1999.

Authors:  Björn Albin; Katarina Hjelm; Sölve Elmståhl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Socioeconomic inequality in clinical outcome among hip fracture patients: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  P K Kristensen; T M Thillemann; A B Pedersen; K Søballe; S P Johnsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  FRAX provides robust fracture prediction regardless of socioeconomic status.

Authors:  S L Brennan; W D Leslie; L M Lix; H Johansson; A Oden; E McCloskey; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.