Kyle Steenland1, Sherry Hu, James Walker. 1. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Avenue, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. nsteenl@sph.emory.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We investigated mortality differences according to socioeconomic status (SES) for employed persons in 27 states during 1984-1997. METHODS: SES was determined for persons aged 35-64 years according to the "usual occupation" listed on their death certificates. We used US Census denominator data. RESULTS: For all-cause mortality, rate ratios from lowest to highest SES quartile for men and women were 2.02, 1.69, 1.25, and 1.00 and 1.29, 1.01, 1.07, and 1.00, respectively. Percentage of all deaths attributable to being in the lowest 3 SES quartiles was 27%. Inverse SES gradients were strong for most major causes of death except breast cancer and colorectal cancer. Heart disease mortality for highest and lowest SES quartiles dropped 45% and 25%, respectively, between 1984 and 1997. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality differences by SES were sustained through the 1990s and are increasing for men.
OBJECTIVES: We investigated mortality differences according to socioeconomic status (SES) for employed persons in 27 states during 1984-1997. METHODS: SES was determined for persons aged 35-64 years according to the "usual occupation" listed on their death certificates. We used US Census denominator data. RESULTS: For all-cause mortality, rate ratios from lowest to highest SES quartile for men and women were 2.02, 1.69, 1.25, and 1.00 and 1.29, 1.01, 1.07, and 1.00, respectively. Percentage of all deaths attributable to being in the lowest 3 SES quartiles was 27%. Inverse SES gradients were strong for most major causes of death except breast cancer and colorectal cancer. Heart disease mortality for highest and lowest SES quartiles dropped 45% and 25%, respectively, between 1984 and 1997. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality differences by SES were sustained through the 1990s and are increasing for men.
Authors: S S Rathore; A K Berger; K P Weinfurt; M Feinleib; W J Oetgen; B J Gersh; K A Schulman Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-08-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: P G McGovern; D R Jacobs; E Shahar; D K Arnett; A R Folsom; H Blackburn; R V Luepker Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-07-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: V Salomaa; M Niemelä; H Miettinen; M Ketonen; P Immonen-Räihä; S Koskinen; M Mähönen; S Lehto; T Vuorenmaa; P Palomäki; H Mustaniemi; E Kaarsalo; M Arstila; J Torppa; K Kuulasmaa; P Puska; K Pyörälä; J Tuomilehto Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-04-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jacques Blacher; Athanase Benetos; Jean Michel Kirzin; Alain Malmejac; Louis Guize; Michel E Safar Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2002-09-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Paul Moayyedi; Anthony T R Axon; Richard Feltbower; Sara Duffett; Will Crocombe; David Braunholtz; I D Gerald Richards; Anthony C Dowell; David Forman Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Ben L Zarzaur; Martin A Croce; Timothy C Fabian; Peter Fischer; Louis J Magnotti Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: M Melchior; L F Berkman; I Kawachi; N Krieger; M Zins; S Bonenfant; M Goldberg Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 3.710