Literature DB >> 16773287

Puborectal sling interposition for the treatment of rectovaginal fistulas.

D M J Oom1, M P Gosselink, V R M Van Dijl, D D E Zimmerman, W R Schouten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several techniques are available for the surgical treatment of rectovaginal fistulas, however often the results are rather disappointing. Interposition of healthy, well vascularized tissue may be the key to rectovaginal fistula healing. The present study was aimed at evaluating the outcome of puborectal sling interposition in the treatment of rectovaginal fistulas.
METHODS: Between 2001 and 2004, 26 consecutive patients (median age, 40.5 years; range, 15-69 years) with a rectovaginal fistula underwent a puborectal sling interposition. The etiology of the fistulas was: obstetric injury (n=11), complications after prior surgery (n=2), bartholinitis (n=4), cryptoglandular perineal abscess (n=2), inflammatory bowel disease (n=2) and idiopathic causes (n=5). The patients received a questionnaire about fecal continence (before and after surgery) and dyspareunia (after surgery).
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 14 months. The recto-vaginal fistula healed in 16 (62%) of 26 patients. In patients who had undergone one or more previous repairs, the healing rate was only 31% versus 92% in patients without previous repairs (p<0.01). The median Rockwood fecal incontinence severity index score did not change as a result of the surgery. Seventeen percent of patients experienced painful intercourse before the operation; after the procedure this problem was encountered by 57% of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The puborectal sling interposition is only successful in patients without previous repairs and in those with an uneventful postoperative course, however dyspareunia is a major drawback of this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16773287     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-006-0265-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  9 in total

1.  Rectovaginal fistula: a new technique and preliminary results using collagen matrix biomesh.

Authors:  K W A Göttgens; J Heemskerk; W van Gemert; R Smeets; L P S Stassen; G Beets; C G M I Baeten; S O Breukink
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Puborectal sling interposition combined with seton drainage for pouch-vaginal fistula after rectal cancer surgery with colonic J pouch-anal reconstruction: report of a case.

Authors:  Aya Kawamoto; Yasuhiro Inoue; Masato Okigami; Yoshinaga Okugawa; Junichiro Hiro; Yuji Toiyama; Koji Tanaka; Keiichi Uchida; Yasuhiko Mohri; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

3.  Minimally invasive treatment of rectovaginal fistula.

Authors:  Giancarlo D'Ambrosio; Alessandro M Paganini; Mario Guerrieri; Luciana Barchetti; Giovanni Lezoche; Bernardina Fabiani; Emanuele Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Rectal sleeve advancement for the treatment of persistent rectovaginal fistulas.

Authors:  W R Schouten; D M J Oom
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Rectovaginal fistula: a new approach by stapled transanal rectal resection.

Authors:  Giovanni Li Destri; Beniamino Scilletta; Tiziana Grazia Tomaselli; Giuseppe Zarbo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Benign rectovaginal fistulas: management and results of a personal series.

Authors:  J M Devesa; M Devesa; G R Velasco; R Vicente; F García-Moreno; A Rey; P López-Hervás; J Die; J M Molina
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Novel treatment for recalcitrant rectovaginal fistulas: fat injection.

Authors:  L de Weerd; S Weum; S Norderval
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Muscle interposition in patients with fistulas between the rectum and urethra or vagina.

Authors:  Daniëlla M J Oom; Martijn P Gosselink; W Rudolph Schouten
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Minimally invasive perineal redo surgery for rectovesical and rectovaginal fistulae: A case series.

Authors:  A A J Grüter; S E Van Oostendorp; L J H Smits; M Kusters; M Özer; J A Nieuwenhuijzen; J B Tuynman
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-11-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.