Literature DB >> 16769035

Selective attention and threat: quick orienting versus slow disengagement and two versions of the dot probe task.

Elske Salemink1, Marcel A van den Hout, Merel Kindt.   

Abstract

The dot probe task is often used to assess attentional bias in anxiety, but some aspects need clarification. First, the results, which are traditionally summarized in an attentional bias index, do not allow for distinguishing between different selective attention processes; orienting and disengagement. Second, different versions of the dot probe task have been used with unknown relative merits. Participants (N=133) completed two versions of the dot probe task: the detection task (i.e. is there a probe?) and the differentiation task (i.e. what sort of probe is it?). The analysis carried out allowed for a differentiation between orienting and disengagement. The main finding was that trait anxiety is related to disengagement difficulties and not to speed of orienting. Concerning the relative merits of the two dot probe task versions, the results suggest that the detection task may be superior to the differentiation task. Implications for past and future research are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 16769035     DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  49 in total

1.  Automatic emotional information processing and the cortisol response to acute psychosocial stress.

Authors:  Mark A Ellenbogen; Robyn J Carson; Rana Pishva
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Toward and away from spiders: eye-movements in spider-fearful participants.

Authors:  Antje B M Gerdes; Paul Pauli; Georg W Alpers
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Narcissism dimensions differentially moderate selective attention to evaluative stimuli in incarcerated offenders.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krusemark; Christopher Lee; Joseph P Newman
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2014-10-20

4.  Phenomenological Characteristics of Attentional Biases Towards Threat: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Josh M Cisler; Amy K Bacon; Nathan L Williams
Journal:  Cognit Ther Res       Date:  2009-04

5.  Neural mechanisms mediating contingent capture of attention by affective stimuli.

Authors:  Crystal Reeck; Kevin S LaBar; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Predictors of response to an attention modification program in generalized social phobia.

Authors:  Nader Amir; Charles T Taylor; Michael C Donohue
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2011-08

7.  Electrocortical evidence for rapid allocation of attention to threat in the dot-probe task.

Authors:  Emily S Kappenman; Annmarie MacNamara; Greg Hajcak Proudfit
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Cannabinoid type 1 receptor availability in the amygdala mediates threat processing in trauma survivors.

Authors:  Robert H Pietrzak; Yiyun Huang; Stefani Corsi-Travali; Ming-Qiang Zheng; Shu-fei Lin; Shannan Henry; Marc N Potenza; Daniele Piomelli; Richard E Carson; Alexander Neumeister
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 9.  Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review.

Authors:  Josh M Cisler; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-12-14

10.  Effects of threat cues on attentional shifting, disengagement and response slowing in anxious individuals.

Authors:  Karin Mogg; Amanda Holmes; Matthew Garner; Brendan P Bradley
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2008-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.