Literature DB >> 19512848

Diffusion-weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping and spectroscopy in prostate cancer.

Michael A Jacobs1, Ronald Ouwerkerk, Kyle Petrowski, Katarzyna J Macura.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer is a major health problem, and the exploration of noninvasive imaging methods that have the potential to improve specificity while maintaining high sensitivity is still critically needed. Tissue changes induced by tumor growth can be visualized by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods. Current MRI methods include conventional T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Techniques such as DWI/ADC provide functional information about the behavior of water molecules in tissue; MRS can provide biochemical information about the presence or absence of certain metabolites, such as choline, creatine, and citrate. Finally, vascular parameters can be investigated using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Moreover, with whole-body MRI and DWI, metastatic disease can be evaluated in 1 session and may provide a way to monitor treatment. Therefore, when combining these various methods, a multiparametric data set can be built to assist in the detection, localization, assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness, and tumor staging. Such a comprehensive approach offers more power to evaluate prostate disease than any single measure alone. In this article, we focus on the role of DWI/ADC and MRS in the detection and characterization using both in vivo and ex vivo imaging of prostate pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19512848      PMCID: PMC3110834          DOI: 10.1097/RMR.0b013e3181aa6b50

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0899-3459


  145 in total

1.  Wash-in rate on the basis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: usefulness for prostate cancer detection and localization.

Authors:  Jeong Kon Kim; Seong Sook Hong; Young Jun Choi; Seong Ho Park; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim; Kyoung-Sik Cho
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Byung Kwan Park; Bohyun Kim; Chan Kyo Kim; Hyun Moo Lee; Ghee Young Kwon
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate and rectal wall: comparison of biexponential and monoexponential modelled diffusion and associated perfusion coefficients.

Authors:  S F Riches; K Hawtin; E M Charles-Edwards; N M de Souza
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in prostate cancer -- comparison between single-shot fast spin echo and echo planar imaging sequences.

Authors:  Piotr Kozlowski; Silvia D Chang; S Larry Goldenberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Detection of locally recurrent prostate cancer after cryosurgery: evaluation by transrectal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and three-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  F Parivar; H Hricak; K Shinohara; J Kurhanewicz; D B Vigneron; S J Nelson; P R Carroll
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Prostate depiction at endorectal MR spectroscopic imaging: investigation of a standardized evaluation system.

Authors:  Juyoung A Jung; Fergus V Coakley; Daniel B Vigneron; Mark G Swanson; Aliya Qayyum; Vivian Weinberg; Kirk D Jones; Peter R Carroll; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissues using echo-planar imaging.

Authors:  Bashar Issa
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Extent of disease based on initial bone scan: important prognostic predictor for patients with metastatic prostatic cancer. Experience from the Scandinavian Prostatic Cancer Group Study No. 2 (SPCG-2).

Authors:  T Jørgensen; C Müller; O Kaalhus; H E Danielsen; K J Tveter
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men.

Authors:  William J Catalona; Jerome P Richie; Frederick R Ahmann; M'Liss A Hudson; Peter T Scardino; Robert C Flanigan; Jean B DeKernion; Timothy L Ratliff; Louis R Kavoussi; Bruce L Dalkin; W Bedford Waters; Michael T MacFarlane; Paula C Southwick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Localized proton MR spectroscopy of citrate in vitro and of the human prostate in vivo at 1.5 T.

Authors:  F Schick; H Bongers; S Kurz; W I Jung; M Pfeffer; O Lutz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  19 in total

1.  Increased signal intensity of prostate lesions on high b-value diffusion-weighted images as a predictive sign of malignancy.

Authors:  Michael Quentin; Lars Schimmöller; Christian Arsov; Robert Rabenalt; Gerald Antoch; Peter Albers; Dirk Blondin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Reducing the influence of b-value selection on diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate: evaluation of a revised monoexponential model within a clinical setting.

Authors:  Yousef Mazaheri; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Oguz Akin; Debra A Goldman; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Tobias Maurer; Matthias Eiber; Markus Schwaiger; Jürgen E Gschwend
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in metabolic and molecular imaging and diagnosis of cancer.

Authors:  Kristine Glunde; Dmitri Artemov; Marie-France Penet; Michael A Jacobs; Zaver M Bhujwalla
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 5.  Locally advanced prostate cancer imaging findings and implications for treatment from the surgical perspective.

Authors:  Sherif B Elsherif; Vishnupriya Kuchana; Rizwan Aslam; Ashish Kamat; Priya R Bhosale; A R Klekers
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-03

Review 6.  Metabolic tumor imaging using magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Kristine Glunde; Zaver M Bhujwalla
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  Clinical utility of the normalized apparent diffusion coefficient for preoperative evaluation of the aggressiveness of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ryo Itatani; Tomohiro Namimoto; Akira Yoshimura; Kazuhiro Katahira; Seiichiro Noda; Nobuyuki Toyonari; Kosuke Kitani; Yasuyuki Hamada; Mitsuhiko Kitaoka; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.374

8.  Modalities for imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A H Hou; D Swanson; A B Barqawi
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2010-03-17

Review 9.  [Molecular multimodal hybrid imaging in prostate and bladder cancer].

Authors:  T Maurer; M Eiber; B J Krause
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  DWI-MRI: single, informative, and noninvasive technique for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Elhousseiny I Ibrahiem; Tarek Mohsen; Adel M Nabeeh; Yasser Osman; Ihab A Hekal; Mohamed Abou El-Ghar
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.