| Literature DB >> 16764709 |
Francisca Mutapi1, Takafira Mduluza, Natalia Gomez-Escobar, William F Gregory, Cecilia Fernandez, Nicholas Midzi, Rick M Maizels.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis is a major parasitic disease affecting over 200 million people in the developing world with a further 400 million people at risk of infection. The aim of this study was to identify a single antigen from adult Schistosoma haematobium worms and subsequently use this antigen to study the development of schistosome-acquired immunity in a human population.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16764709 PMCID: PMC1523344 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-96
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Figure 1Amino acid alignment of the S. haematobium Sh13 and the S. mansoni Sm13 (accession number AAC25419) proteins.
Figure 2Coomassie Blue stained gel showing the Sh13-MBP fusionprotein in lane 1 and the two products; MBP and Sh13 of Factor Xa digestion in lane 2.
Figure 3a) Infection levels of the study population divided into 2-year age classes with sample sizes as follows 7–8 years old n = 12; 9–10 years old, n = 15; 11–12 years old, n = 28; 13–14 year old, n = 46; 15–16 year old, n = 31; and 17–18 year old, n = 15. The histogram shows infection intensity (log10(x+1) transformed) with bars representing the standard error of the mean, while the line shows infection prevalence.
Figure 4a) Age-antibody profile for anti-Sh13 IgG subclasses (square root transformed) for the age groups in figure 3 showing that IgG3 and IgG1 are the predominant subclasses produced against this antigen. Diamonds represent IgG1, squares IgG2, triangles IgG3 and asterix IgG4. b) Age-antibody profile for anti-SWAP IgG subclasses (square root transformed) for the age groups in figure 3 showing that IgG1 and IgG4 are the predominant subclasses produced against this antigen.
Comparison of infection and antibody levels between the four groups.
| t = -1.942, df = 53 | χ2 = 4.114, df = 1, | t = -1820, df = 53, | |
| t = -1.062, df = 102, p = 0.145 | χ2 = 4.503, df = 1, | t = -1.441, df = 102, p = 0.077 | |
| t = 1.709, df = 40, | χ2 = 0.019, df = 1, p = 0.890 | t = -2.906, df = 40, | |
| t = 1.438, df = 103, p = 0.077 | χ2 = 0.145, df = 1, p = 0.704 | t = 0.679, df = 103, p = 0.25 | |
| t = 3.170, df = 41, | χ2 = 2.563, df = 1, p = 0.109 | t = -1.165, df = 41, p = 0.126 | |
| t = 2.625, df = 90, | χ2 = 2.376, df = 1, p = 0.123 | t = -2.044, df = 90, |
The table compares infection intensity, prevalence and anti-Sh13 IgG3 amongst the four groups which the population has been partitioned as shown in Figure 3. Results from post-hoc tests are presented after one way ANOVA showed that infection intensity and anti-sh13 IgG3 levels differed significantly across the 4 age groups (F = 3.863, df = 3, 147, p = 0.011 and F = 2.946, df = 3, 147, p = 0.045 for infection intensity and anti-sh13 IgG3 respectively). Significant differences are highlighted in bold font.
Figure 5Age-antibody profile for anti-Sh13 IgG3 (square root transformed). This figure gives more detail on the anti-Sh13 IgG3 profile shown in Figure 4a, by showing the antibody levels relative to the partitioning of the population by infection intensity and also giving the standard error of the mean represented by bars on the graph.
Figure 6Correlation between infection intensity (log10 (x+1) transformed) and antibody levels (square root transformed). r is the correlation coefficient and p values are also given. The youngest age group (7–10) is excluded from the analysis as they are producing very little amounts ofanti-Sh13IgG3. a) Age group where infection levels peak (11–12 yearsold). b) Age group where infection levels are declining (13–16 years old). c) Age group where infection levels are lowest (17–18 years old).