| Literature DB >> 21204849 |
F Mutapi1, C Bourke, Y Harcus, N Midzi, T Mduluza, C M Turner, R Burchmore, R M Maizels.
Abstract
Schistosoma haematobium antigen recognition profiles of the human isotypes IgA, IgE, IgG1 and IgG4 were compared by image analysis of western blots. Adult worm antigens separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis were probed with pooled sera from Zimbabweans resident in a S. haematobium endemic area, followed by the identification of individual antigenic parasite proteins using mass spectrometry. Overall, IgG1 reacted with the largest number of antigens, followed by IgE and IgA which detected the same number, while IgG4 detected the fewest antigens. IgE recognized all antigens reactive with IgG4 as well as an additional four antigens, an isoform of 28-kDa GST, phosphoglycerate kinase, actin 1 and calreticulin. IgG1 additionally recognized fatty acid-binding protein, triose-phosphate isomerase and heat shock protein 70, which were not recognized by IgA. Recognition patterns varied between some isoforms, e.g. the two fructose 1-6-bis-phosphate aldolase isoforms were differentially recognized by IgA and IgG1. Although the majority of S. haematobium adult worm antigens are recognized by all of the four isotypes, there are clear restrictions in antibody recognition for some antigens. This may partly explain differences observed in isotype dynamics at a population level. Differential recognition patterns for some isoforms indicated in the study have potential importance for vaccine development.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21204849 PMCID: PMC3084999 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2010.01270.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasite Immunol ISSN: 0141-9838 Impact factor: 2.280
Figure 1Description of the individual study participants partitioned by age group. (a) Infection intensity for each individual calculated as a mean of eggs/10 mL of urine from at least two urine samples collected on consecutive days. (b) Antibody levels measured as optical densities for each individual (c) The relationship between the ratios of IgG1/IgA and IgE/IgG4 calculated from the values in (1B) above and schistosome infection intensity for each individual participant. These show a significant negative association between the ratio IgE/IgG4 and infection intensity and no significant association between the IgG1/IgA ratio and infection intensity.
Figure 2Antigen recognition patterns of the serum pool compared by two-dimensional western blotting. (a) IgA vs. IgG1. (b) IgE vs. IgG4.
The table gives identities of the antigenic spots in Figure 3, relating the spot number to its protein identity from the peptide searches and recognition intensity by each of the isotypes
Figure 3Comparison of recognition intensity for each antigenic spot by the different isotypes showing a significant positive correlation between all 4 isotypes. Italicized numbers refer to the spot identity of antigenic spots preferentially recognized by one of the two isotypes, and their protein identities are given in Table 1. (a) IgG1 vs. IgA. (b) IgG4 vs. IgE. (c) IgG4 vs. IgG1. (d) IgG4 vs. IgA. (e) IgE vs. IgG1. (f) IgE vs. IgA.