Literature DB >> 16763851

Tibial press-fit fixation of the hamstring tendons for ACL-reconstruction.

M Jagodzinski1, K Scheunemann, K Knobloch, K Albrecht, C Krettek, C Hurschler, J Zeichen.   

Abstract

Press-fit fixation of patellar tendon bone anterior cruciate ligament autografts is an interesting technique because no hardware is necessary to achieve fixation. Up till the present point, there is no biomechanical data available for the tibial press-fit fixation of the hamstring tendons. Hamstring tendons of 21 human cadavers (age: 41.9 +/- 13.1 years) were used. A press-fit fixation with looped semitendinosus and gracilis tendons secured by a tape (T) over a bone bridge, or by a baseball-stitched suture (S), was compared with degradable interference screw fixation (I) in 21 porcine tibiae. The constructs were cyclically strained and subsequently loaded to failure. The maximum load to failure, stiffness, and elongation during cyclical loading were measured. The maximum load to failure was highest for the T-fixation at 970 +/- 83 N, followed by the I-fixation with 544 +/- 109 N, and the S-fixation with 402 +/- 78 N (P < 0.03). Stiffness of the constructs averaged 78 +/- 13 N/mm for T, 108 +/- 18 N/mm for S, and 162 +/- 27 N/mm for I (P < 0.03). Elongation during initial cyclical loading was 2.0 +/- 0.6 mm for T, 3.3 +/- 1.1 mm for S, and 1.4 +/- 0.5 mm for I (S inferior to I and T, P<0.05). Elongation between the 20th and 1,500th loading cycle was lower for T (2.2 +/- 0.7 mm) compared with I (4.1 +/- 2.7 mm) and S (4.8 +/- 0.7 mm; P < 0.001). The T-fixation technique exhibited a significantly higher failure load than the S-, and I- techniques. All techniques exhibited larger elongation during initial cyclical loading than is reported in the literature for grafts with bone blocks. Only one technique (T) showed satisfactory elongation behavior during long-term cyclic loading. Interference screw fixation demonstrated significantly higher stiffness. Only one of the investigated techniques (T) seemed to exhibit adequate mechanical properties necessary for early aggressive rehabilitation programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16763851     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-006-0105-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  32 in total

1.  Comparison of endoscopic and two-incision techniques for reconstructing a torn anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendons.

Authors:  S M Howell; M L Deutsch
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  The influence of screw geometry on hamstring tendon interference fit fixation.

Authors:  A Weiler; R F Hoffmann; C J Siepe; S F Kolbeck; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Tendon healing in a bone tunnel. Part II: Histologic analysis after biodegradable interference fit fixation in a model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in sheep.

Authors:  Andreas Weiler; Reinhard F G Hoffmann; Hermann J Bail; Oliver Rehm; Norbert P Südkamp
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Porcine tibia is a poor substitute for human cadaver tibia for evaluating interference screw fixation.

Authors:  Janne T Nurmi; Harri Sievänen; Pekka Kannus; Markku Järvinen; Teppo L N Järvinen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Apr-May       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 5.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, hamstring versus bone-patella tendon-bone grafts: a systematic literature review of outcome from surgery.

Authors:  Lee Herrington; Charlotte Wrapson; Martyn Matthews; Helen Matthews
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction?

Authors:  J Höher; H D Möller; F H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Structural properties of six tibial fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue grafts.

Authors:  H E Magen; S M Howell; M L Hull
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Hamstring tendon fixation using interference screws: a biomechanical study in calf tibial bone.

Authors:  A Weiler; R F Hoffmann; A C Stähelin; H J Bail; C J Siepe; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a patellar tendon graft in press-fit technique: surgical technique and follow-up.

Authors:  H Boszotta
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Initial fixation strength of modified patellar tendon grafts for anatomic fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  R F Hoffmann; R Peine; H J Bail; N P Südkamp; A Weiler
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  9 in total

1.  [Biomechanical analysis of press-fit fixation of anterior cruciate ligament transplants].

Authors:  M Jagodzinski; M Ettinger; C Haasper; S Hankemeier; D Breitmeier; C Hurschler; C Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings using press-fit fixation without hardware: operative technique and long-term results of a prospective and randomized study].

Authors:  H H Pässler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Biomechanical properties of femoral posterior cruciate ligament fixations.

Authors:  M Ettinger; M Petri; K T Haag; S Brand; A Dratzidis; C Hurschler; C Krettek; M Jagodzinski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  [Biodegradable screw versus a press-fit bone plug fixation for ACL reconstruction: a prospective randomized study].

Authors:  B Geiges; C von Falck; K Knobloch; C Haasper; R Meller; C Krettek; S Hankemeier; J Brand; M Jagodzinski
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  Graft fixation alternatives in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Bernardino Saccomanni
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2011-05-03

6.  [Implant-free tibial fixations of the posterior cruciate ligament. Development and biomechanical testing].

Authors:  T Wehrhahn; M Ettinger; M Petri; E Liodakis; C Hurschler; U-V Albrecht; C Krettek; M Jagodzinski
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  The fixation strength of tibial PCL press-fit reconstructions.

Authors:  M Ettinger; T Wehrhahn; M Petri; E Liodakis; G Olender; U-V Albrecht; C Hurschler; C Krettek; M Jagodzinski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  [Implant-free anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with diamond instruments. A biological and anatomic method for every ligament transplantation].

Authors:  G Felmet
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Femoral press-fit fixation versus interference screw fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: 20-year follow-up.

Authors:  A Biazzo; A Manzotti; K Motavalli; N Confalonieri
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-02-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.