Literature DB >> 21442221

Improving balance function using vestibular stochastic resonance: optimizing stimulus characteristics.

Ajitkumar P Mulavara1, Matthew J Fiedler, Igor S Kofman, Scott J Wood, Jorge M Serrador, Brian Peters, Helen S Cohen, Millard F Reschke, Jacob J Bloomberg.   

Abstract

Stochastic resonance (SR) is a phenomenon whereby the response of a non-linear system to a weak periodic input signal is optimized by the presence of a particular non-zero level of noise. Stochastic resonance using imperceptible stochastic vestibular electrical stimulation, when applied to normal young and elderly subjects, has been shown to significantly improve ocular stabilization reflexes in response to whole-body tilt; improved balance performance during postural disturbances and optimize covariance between the weak input periodic signals introduced via venous blood pressure receptors and the heart rate responses. In our study, 15 subjects stood on a compliant surface with their eyes closed. They were given low-amplitude binaural bipolar stochastic electrical stimulation of the vestibular organs in two frequency ranges of 1-2 and 0-30 Hz over the amplitude range of 0 to ±700 μA. Subjects were instructed to maintain an upright stance during 43-s trials, which consisted of baseline (zero amplitude) and stimulation (non-zero amplitude) periods. Measures of stability of the head and trunk using inertial motion unit sensors attached to these segments and the whole body using a force plate were measured and quantified in the mediolateral plane. Using a multivariate optimization criterion, our results show that the low levels of vestibular stimulation given to the vestibular organs improved balance performance in normal healthy subjects in the range of 5-26% consistent with the stochastic resonance phenomenon. In our study, 8 of 15 and 10 of 15 subjects were responsive for the 1-2- and 0-30-Hz stimulus signals, respectively. The improvement in balance performance did not differ significantly between the stimulations in the two frequency ranges. The amplitude of optimal stimulus for improving balance performance was predominantly in the range of ±100 to ±400 μA. A device based on SR stimulation of the vestibular system might be useful as either a training modality to enhance adaptability or skill acquisition, or as a miniature patch-type stimulator that may be worn by people with disabilities due to aging or disease to improve posture and locomotion function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21442221     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2633-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  41 in total

1.  Sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Noisy vestibular stimulation improves autonomic and motor responsiveness in central neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Yamamoto; Zbigniew R Struzik; Rika Soma; Kyoko Ohashi; Shin Kwak
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  Modeling postural instability with Galvanic vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  Hamish G MacDougall; Steven T Moore; Ian S Curthoys; F Owen Black
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Noise-enhanced balance control in patients with diabetes and patients with stroke.

Authors:  Attila A Priplata; Benjamin L Patritti; James B Niemi; Richard Hughes; Denise C Gravelle; Lewis A Lipsitz; Aristidis Veves; Joel Stein; Paolo Bonato; James J Collins
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 10.422

5.  The effects of stochastic galvanic vestibular stimulation on human postural sway.

Authors:  A E Pavlik; J T Inglis; M Lauk; L Oddsson; J J Collins
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Dynamic regulation of sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  Robert J Peterka; Patrick J Loughlin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Critical features of training that facilitate adaptive generalization of over ground locomotion.

Authors:  Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Helen S Cohen; Jacob J Bloomberg
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2008-10-05       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 8.  Noise in the nervous system.

Authors:  A Aldo Faisal; Luc P J Selen; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Noise-enhanced balance control in older adults.

Authors:  Denise C Gravelle; Carrie A Laughton; Neel T Dhruv; Kunal D Katdare; James B Niemi; Lewis A Lipsitz; James J Collins
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-10-28       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Short-latency eye movements evoked by near-threshold galvanic vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  Alexandra Séverac Cauquil; Mary Faldon; Konstantin Popov; Brian L Day; Adolfo M Bronstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  40 in total

1.  Effect of mechanical tactile noise on amplitude of visual evoked potentials: multisensory stochastic resonance.

Authors:  Ignacio Méndez-Balbuena; Nayeli Huidobro; Mayte Silva; Amira Flores; Carlos Trenado; Luis Quintanar; Oscar Arias-Carrión; Rumyana Kristeva; Elias Manjarrez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Sinusoidal vibrotactile stimulation differentially improves force steadiness depending on contraction intensity.

Authors:  Carina Marconi Germer; Luciana Sobral Moreira; Leonardo Abdala Elias
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Improving postural control by applying mechanical noise to ankle muscle tendons.

Authors:  Liliane Borel; Edith Ribot-Ciscar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Reduction of cybersickness during and immediately following noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  Séamas Weech; Travis Wall; Michael Barnett-Cowan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Use of stochastic resonance methods for improving laparoscopic surgery performance.

Authors:  Robert Hoskins; Jinling Wang; Caroline G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Effects of Stochastic Vestibular Galvanic Stimulation and LDOPA on Balance and Motor Symptoms in Patients With Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Ghazaleh Samoudi; Maria Jivegård; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Filip Bergquist
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 7.  Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation: an emerging treatment option for bilateral vestibulopathy.

Authors:  Max Wuehr; Julian Decker; Roman Schniepp
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Perception of threshold-level whole-body motion during mechanical mastoid vibration.

Authors:  Rakshatha Kabbaligere; Charles S Layne; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  Customized noise-stimulation intensity for bipedal stability and unipedal balance deficits associated with functional ankle instability.

Authors:  Scott E Ross; Shelley W Linens; Cynthia J Wright; Brent L Arnold
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Calibrating balance perturbation using electrical stimulation of the vestibular system.

Authors:  R Goel; M J Rosenberg; H S Cohen; J J Bloomberg; A P Mulavara
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.