Literature DB >> 16760538

Internet recruitment and e-mail interviews in qualitative studies.

Rebekah J Hamilton1, Barbara J Bowers.   

Abstract

In 2004, 111 million adults accessed the Internet looking for health and medical information. Qualitative researchers can apply long-standing principles of recruitment and interviewing to the Internet. The purpose of this article is to examine the theoretical and methodological aspects of Internet recruitment and e-mail interviewing. The authors address issues of appropriateness, adequacy, representativeness, sample bias, data fraud, flexibility and consistency in interviewing, timing, elimination of the need for transcription, oral versus written communication, reliability and validity, and ethical concerns. They include some practical suggestions on a research design for a qualitative study employing both Internet recruitment and e-mail interviewing.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16760538     DOI: 10.1177/1049732306287599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  19 in total

1.  Internet Recruitment of Asian American Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Eun-Ok Im; Yaelim Lee; Xiaopeng Ji; Jingwen Zhang; Sangmi Kim; Eunice Chee; Wonshik Chee; Hsiu-Min Tsai; Masakazu Nishigaki; Seon Ae Yeo; Marilyn M Shapira; Jun James Mao
Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.824

2.  Challenges in a Technology-Based Cancer Pain Management Program Among Asian American Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Eun-Ok Im; Xiaopeng Ji; Sangmi Kim; Eunice Chee; Ting Bao; Jun J Mao; Wonshik Chee
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 3.  Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research?

Authors:  Gina Novick
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.228

4.  The effect of BRCA gene testing on family relationships: A thematic analysis of qualitative interviews.

Authors:  Heather A Douglas; Rebekah J Hamilton; Robin E Grubs
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Faculty mentors' and students' perceptions of students' research self-efficacy.

Authors:  Elise L Lev; John Kolassa; Lori L Bakken
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 3.442

6.  Life trajectories, genetic testing, and risk reduction decisions in 18-39 year old women at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Rebekah Hamilton; Janet K Williams; Barbara J Bowers; Kathleen Calzone
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Analysis of Advantages, Limitations, and Barriers of Genetic Counseling Service Delivery Models.

Authors:  Stephanie A Cohen; Rachelle C Huziak; Shanna Gustafson; Robin E Grubs
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Comparing appropriateness and equivalence of email interviews to phone interviews in qualitative research on reproductive decisions.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Karen Kavanaugh
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.257

9.  Communications between volunteers and health researchers during recruitment and informed consent: qualitative content analysis of email interactions.

Authors:  Anne Townsend; Zubin Amarsi; Catherine L Backman; Susan M Cox; Linda C Li
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 10.  Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations: A Delphi Consensus Study.

Authors:  Krishma Labib; Rea Roje; Lex Bouter; Guy Widdershoven; Natalie Evans; Ana Marušić; Lidwine Mokkink; Joeri Tijdink
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.525

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.