| Literature DB >> 16759389 |
Seong-Su Han1, Liangping Peng, Seung-Tae Chung, Wendy DuBois, Sung-Ho Maeng, Arthur L Shaffer, Michael B Sporn, Siegfried Janz.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gene-targeted iMycEmu mice that carry a His6-tagged mouse Myc(c-myc)cDNA, MycHis, just 5' of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain enhancer, Emu, are prone to B cell and plasma cell neoplasms, such as lymphoblastic B-cell lymphoma (LBL) and plasmacytoma (PCT). Cell lines derived from Myc-induced neoplasms of this sort may provide a good model system for the design and testing of new approaches to prevent and treat MYC-driven B cell and plasma cell neoplasms in human beings. To test this hypothesis, we used the LBL-derived cell line, iMycEmu-1, and the newly established PCT-derived cell line, iMycEmu-2, to evaluate the growth inhibitory and death inducing potency of the cancer drug candidate, CDDO-imidazolide (CDDO-Im).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16759389 PMCID: PMC1553469 DOI: 10.1186/1476-4598-5-22
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Cancer ISSN: 1476-4598 Impact factor: 27.401
Figure 1Features of iMyc. A, Cytofuge specimen stained according to May-Grünwald-Giemsa. A bi-nucleated cell (arrow) and a cell undergoing mitosis (arrowhead) adjoin neoplastic plasmablasts containing the typical paranuclear hof of neoplastic plasmablasts and plasma cells (asterisk). B, B-cell surface marker expression determined by FACS (green lines) compared to isotype controls (purple histograms). C, Western analysis of Myc protein using β-actin as loading control. D, RT-PCR analysis of Myc and MycHis mRNA compared to β-actin message.
Figure 2CDDO-Im-dependent growth arrest and apoptosis in iMyc. A, MTS assay of cell proliferation, demonstrating growth inhibition in iMycEμ-1 and-2 cells by ≥200 nM and ≥500 nM CDDO-Im, respectively. Low concentrations of CDDO-Im (100–200 nM) caused growth promotion in iMycEμ-2 cells by an unknown mechanism. B, Cell cycle arrest and increased number of cells with sub-G0/G1 DNA content, as determined by FACS. The percentage values shown above the histograms indicate the fraction of cells with sub-G0/G1, G0/G1 and S/M DNA content, respectively. C, FACS analysis of cells containing activated caspase 3 upon treatment with CDDO-Im (green lines) or left untreated (purple histograms). D, FACS analysis of CDDO-Im treated cells (open columns) and untreated cells (striped columns) undergoing apoptosis based on annexin V and 7-AAD reactivity. E, Fragmentation of genomic DNA detected by electrophoresis in an agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide.
Figure 3CDDO-Im-dependent abrogation of NFκB in iMyc. A, Determination of Myc protein using Western analysis (upper panel) and determination of MycHis, Myc, and Gapd mRNA using allele-specific RT-PCR (lower panel). B, Measurement of MycHis and Myc mRNA using allele-specific qPCR.
Figure 4Number of differentially expressed genes in iMyc. Plotted is the overall result of the gene expression analysis using the four cDNA arrays presented in Figure 5. See Additional File 1 for details.
Concordantly up-regulated genes upon treatment with CDDO-Im
| Gene symbol | Gene name | Gene function | Cell line | Array1 | Pos.2 | |
| iMyc-1 | iMyc-2 | |||||
| Arc | activity regulated cytoskeletal-associated protein | CARD family | 2.4 | 47 | Apo | C1 |
| Bcl2 | B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 2 | Bcl2 family | 2.2 | 2.9 | Apo | C2 |
| Biklk | Bcl2-interacting killer-like (Bik) | Bcl2 family | 2.4 | 2.0 | Apo | B3 |
| Casp8 | caspase 8 | caspase family | 5.5 | 4.6 | Apo | H5 |
| Tox | G1 | |||||
| Casp9 | caspase 9 | caspase family | 10 | 6.5 | Apo | B6 |
| Casp14 | caspase 14 | caspase family | 15 | 23 | Apo | C5 |
| Creb1 | cAMP responsive element binding protein 1 | transcription factor | 2.1 | 2.8 | Cycle | E1 |
| NFκB | E1 | |||||
| Csf2 | colony stimulating factor 2 | cytokine | 3.4 | 5.9 | NFκB | G1 |
| Cyp2a4 | cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily a, polypeptide 5 | oxidative/metabolic stress | 25 | 20 | Tox | A3 |
| Cyp2b9 | cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily b, polypeptide 9 | oxidative/metabolic stress | 14 | 14 | Tox | C3 |
| Cyp2c29 | cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily c, polypeptide 29 | oxidative/metabolic stress | 14 | 434 | Tox | D3 |
| Cyp4a10 | cytochrome P450, family 4, subfamily a, polypeptide 10 | oxidative/metabolic stress | 4.9 | 4.5 | Tox | F3 |
| Egr1 | early growth response 1 | oxidative/metabolic stress | 2.5 | 3.9 | NFκB | A2 |
| Fmo4 | flavin containing monooxygenase 4 | oxidative/metabolic stress | 286 | 145 | Tox | D5 |
| Gadd45a | growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible 45 alpha | ATM/p53 pathway | 2.4 | 2 | Apo | E7 |
| Tox | F5 | |||||
| Gstm1 | glutathione S-transferase, mu 1 | oxidative/metabolic stress | 4.4 | 16 | Tox | C6 |
| Gstm3 | glutathione S-transferase, mu 3 | oxidative/metabolic stress | 2.4 | 3.3 | Tox | D6 |
| Hmox1 | heme oxygenase (decycling) 1 | oxidative/metabolic stress | 10 | 12 | Tox | E6 |
| Ifna1 | interferon alpha family, gene 1 | cytokine | 4.9 | 7.9 | NFκB | A3 |
| Ifng | interferon gamma | inflammation | 2.0 | 2.8 | NFκB | C3 |
| Il1b | interleukin 1 beta | inflammation | 4.0 | 11 | NFκB | A4 |
| Il1r2 | interleukin 1 receptor, type II | inflammation | 2.1 | 2.0 | NFκB | C4 |
| Lta | lymphotoxin A | TNF ligand family | 4.1 | 65 | Apo | G7 |
| NFκB | E5 | |||||
| Nol3 | nucleolar protein 3 (apoptosis repressor with CARD domain) | apoptosis/necrosis | 64 | 8.4 | Apo | E8 |
| Scya3 | chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3 (Mip-1 alpha) | inflammation | 5.5 | 25 | Tox | H10 |
| Scyb10 | chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 10 | inflammation | 2.7 | 4.3 | Tox | B11 |
| Tnfrsf11a | tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 11a (RANK) | TNF ligand family | 2.7 | 102 | Apo | D9 |
| NFκB | G11 | |||||
| Tnfrsf25 | tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 6 (CD178, CD95L, Fasl, gld) | apoptosis/necrosis | 9.6 | 37 | Apo | F9 |
| Tnfsf6 | tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 6 | TNF ligand family | 12 | 8.2 | Tox | H11 |
| Ugt1a1 | UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1 family, member 1 | DNA damage/repair | 4.6 | 6.8 | Tox | C12 |
1GEArray Q series mouse cDNA gene arrays (SuperArray Bioscience Corporation, Gaithersburg, MD) included the MM-001 cell cycle array (Cycle), MM-002 apoptosis array (Apo), MM-012 stress and toxicity array (Tox) and MM-016 NFκB signaling array (NFκB).
2Array position, as indicated in Figure 3
Figure 5CDDO-Im-induced up-regulation of genes in both iMyc. Shown are cDNA arrays containing 96 genes involved in cell cycling (top row), apoptosis (2nd row), stress and toxicity responses (3rd row) and NFκB signaling (bottom row). CDDO-Im-treated and untreated samples are presented as pairs. Indicated by red squares are CDDO-Im-induced genes. The corresponding controls are indicated by black squares to the left. Gene designations are given in the pink text box on the right. Underlined genes were confirmed on two different arrays. Compare Table 1 for additional details.
Figure 6Verification of gene array results using RT-PCR. Shown are ethidium bromide-stained PCR fragments of six different genes found to be up-regulated 10-fold or more in CDDO-Im-treated iMycEμ-1 and-2 cells. The iMycEμ-1 and-2 cells had been treated for 24 hrs with 0.4 μM and 1 μM CDDO-Im, respectively. The fragments were compared to those detected in untreated cells using the same assay conditions. See Table 1 for further details and Additional File 2 for PCR primers and reaction conditions.
Figure 7CDDO-Im inhibits peritoneal plasmacytomas in iMyc. Mice were injected i.p. on day 1 with 0.2 ml pristane and either treated with CDDO-Im (100 μg per 50-μl i.p. injection, n = 14) or vehicle control (50 μl PEG 400, n = 11). Treatment commenced on day 7 and continued three times per week throughout the observation period (60 days). The diagnosis of plasmacytoma was established on days 30 and 60 post pristane, using stained ascites cell specimens. Tumor incidence was compared using χ2 analysis, the results of which (probability values, p) are indicated above the columns.