Literature DB >> 16757869

MR guided focused ultrasound: technical acceptance measures for a clinical system.

K R Gorny1, N J Hangiandreou, G K Hesley, B S Gostout, K P McGee, J P Felmlee.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a hybrid technique which offers efficient and safe focused ultrasound (FUS) treatments of uterine fibroids under MR guidance and monitoring. As a therapy device, MRgFUS requires systematic testing over a wide range of operational parameters prior to use in the clinical environment. We present technical acceptance tests and data for the first clinical MRgFUS system, ExAblate 2000 (InSightec Inc., Haifa, Israel), that has been FDA approved for treating uterine fibroids. These tests characterize MRgFUS by employing MR temperature measurements in tissue mimicking phantoms. The coronal scan plane is empirically demonstrated to be most reliable for measuring temperature elevations resulting from high intensity ultrasound (US) pulses ('sonications') and shows high sensitivity to changes in sonication parameters. Temperatures measured in the coronal plane were used as a measure of US energy deposited within the focal spot for a range of sonication parameters used in clinical treatments: spot type, spot length, output power, sonication duration, US frequency, and depth of sonication. In addition, MR images acquired during sonications were used to measure effective diameters and lengths of available sonication spot types and lengths. At a constant 60 W output power, the effective spot type diameters were measured to vary between 4.7 +/- 0.3 mm and 6.6 +/- 0.4 mm; treatment temperatures were found to decrease with increasing spot diameter. Prescribing different spot lengths was found to have no effect on the measured length or on measured temperatures. Tests of MRgFUS positioning accuracy determined errors in the direction parallel to the propagation of the US beam to be significantly greater than those in the perpendicular direction; most sonication spots were erroneously positioned towards the FUS transducer. The tests reported here have been demonstrated to be sufficiently sensitive to detect water leakage inside the FUS transducer. The data presented could be used for comparison by those conducting acceptance tests on other clinical MRgFUS systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16757869     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/12/011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  14 in total

1.  The effect of electronically steering a phased array ultrasound transducer on near-field tissue heating.

Authors:  Allison Payne; Urvi Vyas; Nick Todd; Joshua de Bever; Douglas A Christensen; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of boiling induced by high intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Tatiana D Khokhlova; Michael S Canney; Donghoon Lee; Kenneth I Marro; Lawrence A Crum; Vera A Khokhlova; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Integrated ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for simultaneous temperature and cavitation monitoring during focused ultrasound therapies.

Authors:  Costas D Arvanitis; Nathan McDannold
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery, present and future.

Authors:  David Schlesinger; Stanley Benedict; Chris Diederich; Wladyslaw Gedroyc; Alexander Klibanov; James Larner
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Adaptive 4D MR imaging using navigator-based respiratory signal for MRI-guided therapy.

Authors:  Junichi Tokuda; Shigehiro Morikawa; Hasnine A Haque; Tetsuji Tsukamoto; Kiyoshi Matsumiya; Hongen Liao; Ken Masamune; Takeyoshi Dohi
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound of uterine leiomyomas: review of a 12-month outcome of 130 clinical patients.

Authors:  Krzysztof R Gorny; David A Woodrum; Douglas L Brown; Tara L Henrichsen; Amy L Weaver; Kimberly K Amrami; Nicholas J Hangiandreou; Heidi A Edmonson; Esther V Bouwsma; Elizabeth A Stewart; Bobbie S Gostout; Dylan A Ehman; Gina K Hesley
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Preservation of the endometrial enhancement after magnetic resonance imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of submucosal uterine fibroids.

Authors:  Young-Sun Kim; Tae-Joong Kim; Hyo Keun Lim; Hyunchul Rhim; Sin-Ho Jung; Joong Hyun Ahn; Jeong-Won Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Ultrafast 1D MR thermometry using phase or frequency mapping.

Authors:  Chang-Sheng Mei; Robert V Mulkern; Koichi Oshio; Nan-kuei Chen; Bruno Madore; Lawrence P Panych; Kullervo Hynynen; Nathan J McDannold
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  An optimum method for pulsed high intensity focused ultrasound treatment of large volumes using the InSightec ExAblate® 2000 system.

Authors:  B E O'Neill; C Karmonik; K C P Li
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Accurate field mapping in the presence of B0 inhomogeneities, applied to MR thermometry.

Authors:  Chang-Sheng Mei; Renxin Chu; W Scott Hoge; Lawrence P Panych; Bruno Madore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.