Literature DB >> 21482137

Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound of uterine leiomyomas: review of a 12-month outcome of 130 clinical patients.

Krzysztof R Gorny1, David A Woodrum, Douglas L Brown, Tara L Henrichsen, Amy L Weaver, Kimberly K Amrami, Nicholas J Hangiandreou, Heidi A Edmonson, Esther V Bouwsma, Elizabeth A Stewart, Bobbie S Gostout, Dylan A Ehman, Gina K Hesley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess 12-month outcomes and safety of clinical magnetic resonance (MR)-guided focused ultrasound (US) treatments of uterine leiomyomas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2005 and December 2009, 150 women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas were clinically treated with MR-guided focused US at a single institution; 130 patients completed treatment and agreed to have their data used for research purposes. Patients were followed through retrospective review of medical records and phone interviews conducted at 3-, 6-, and 12-month intervals after treatment to assess additional procedures and symptom relief. Outcome measures and treatment complications were analyzed for possible correlations with the appearance of the tumors on T2-weighted imaging.
RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of additional tumor-related treatments 12 months after MR-guided focused US was 7.4% by the Kaplan-Meier method. At 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up, 86% (90 of 105), 93% (92 of 99), and 88% (78 of 89) of patients reported relief of symptoms, respectively. No statistically significant correlation between tumor appearance on T2-weighted imaging and 12-month outcome was found. Treatment-related complications were observed in 17 patients (13.1%): 16 patients had minor complications and one had a major complication (deep vein thrombosis). All complications were resolved within the 12-month follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: MR-guided focused US is a noninvasive treatment option that can be used to effectively and safely treat uterine leiomyomas and delivers significant and lasting symptom relief for at least 12 months. The incidence of additional treatment during this time period is comparable with those in previous reports of uterine artery embolization.
Copyright © 2011 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21482137      PMCID: PMC5384472          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.01.458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  21 in total

1.  MR guided focused ultrasound: technical acceptance measures for a clinical system.

Authors:  K R Gorny; N J Hangiandreou; G K Hesley; B S Gostout; K P McGee; J P Felmlee
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Chronic gynecological conditions reported by US women: findings from the National Health Interview Survey, 1984 to 1992.

Authors:  K H Kjerulff; B A Erickson; P W Langenberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Predictive factors for fibroids recurrence after uterine artery embolisation.

Authors:  Henri Marret; Jean Philippe Cottier; Ana Maria Alonso; Bruno Giraudeau; Gilles Body; Denis Herbreteau
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Leiomyoma shrinkage after MRI-guided focused ultrasound treatment: report of 80 patients.

Authors:  Suzanne D LeBlang; Katherine Hoctor; Fred L Steinberg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  The appropriateness of recommendations for hysterectomy.

Authors:  M S Broder; D E Kanouse; B S Mittman; S J Bernstein
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 6.  Myomectomy for fertility enhancement and preservation.

Authors:  B S Verkauf
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroid tumors: safety and feasibility of a noninvasive thermoablative technique.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stewart; Wladyslaw M W Gedroyc; Clare M C Tempany; Bradley J Quade; Yael Inbar; Tilman Ehrenstein; Asher Shushan; Jonathan T Hindley; Robert D Goldin; Matthias David; Miri Sklair; Jaron Rabinovici
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  A clinical review of focused ultrasound ablation with magnetic resonance guidance: an option for treating uterine fibroids.

Authors:  Gina K Hesley; Krzysztof R Gorny; Tara L Henrichsen; David A Woodrum; Douglas L Brown
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.657

9.  Clinical outcomes of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine myomas: 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  K Funaki; H Fukunishi; K Sawada
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 7.299

10.  Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988-1990.

Authors:  L S Wilcox; L M Koonin; R Pokras; L T Strauss; Z Xia; H B Peterson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  37 in total

1.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI serves as a predictor of HIFU treatment outcome for uterine fibroids with hyperintensity in T2-weighted images.

Authors:  Wen-Peng Zhao; Jin-Yun Chen; Wen-Zhi Chen
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Reassessing hysterectomy.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stewart; Lynne T Shuster; Walter A Rocca
Journal:  Minn Med       Date:  2012-03

Review 3.  Reproductive impact of MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery for fibroids: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Natalie A Clark; Sunni L Mumford; James H Segars
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.927

4.  Portable ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound with functions for safe and rapid ablation: prospective clinical trial for uterine fibroids-short-term and long-term results.

Authors:  Jae Young Lee; Hyun Hoon Chung; Soo Yeon Kang; Eun-Joo Park; Dong Hyuk Park; Keonho Son; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  [MR-guided focused ultrasound. Current and future applications].

Authors:  C G Trumm; A Napoli; M Peller; D-A Clevert; R Stahl; M Reiser; M Matzko
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  HIFU for palliative treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Tatiana D Khokhlova; Joo Ha Hwang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2011-09

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided volumetric ablation of symptomatic leiomyomata: correlation of imaging with histology.

Authors:  Aradhana M Venkatesan; Ari Partanen; Tajana Klepac Pulanic; Matthew R Dreher; John Fischer; Robert K Zurawin; Raja Muthupillai; Sham Sokka; Heikki J Nieminen; Ninet Sinaii; Maria Merino; Bradford J Wood; Pamela Stratton
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Periprocedural outcomes comparing fibroid embolization and focused ultrasound: a randomized controlled trial and comprehensive cohort analysis.

Authors:  Emily P Barnard; Ahmed M AbdElmagied; Lisa E Vaughan; Amy L Weaver; Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso; Gina K Hesley; David A Woodrum; Vanessa L Jacoby; Maureen P Kohi; Thomas M Price; Angel Nieves; Michael J Miller; Bijan J Borah; Krzysztof R Gorny; Phyllis C Leppert; Lisa G Peterson; Elizabeth A Stewart
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation of Uterine Fibroids - Potential Impact on Fertility and Pregnancy Outcome.

Authors:  M K Bohlmann; F Hoellen; P Hunold; M David
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 10.  Clinical and Technical Aspects of MR-Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Treatment of Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids.

Authors:  Laura E Rueff; Steven S Raman
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.