Literature DB >> 16754957

Microtubules can bear enhanced compressive loads in living cells because of lateral reinforcement.

Clifford P Brangwynne1, Frederick C MacKintosh, Sanjay Kumar, Nicholas A Geisse, Jennifer Talbot, L Mahadevan, Kevin K Parker, Donald E Ingber, David A Weitz.   

Abstract

Cytoskeletal microtubules have been proposed to influence cell shape and mechanics based on their ability to resist large-scale compressive forces exerted by the surrounding contractile cytoskeleton. Consistent with this, cytoplasmic microtubules are often highly curved and appear buckled because of compressive loads. However, the results of in vitro studies suggest that microtubules should buckle at much larger length scales, withstanding only exceedingly small compressive forces. This discrepancy calls into question the structural role of microtubules, and highlights our lack of quantitative knowledge of the magnitude of the forces they experience and can withstand in living cells. We show that intracellular microtubules do bear large-scale compressive loads from a variety of physiological forces, but their buckling wavelength is reduced significantly because of mechanical coupling to the surrounding elastic cytoskeleton. We quantitatively explain this behavior, and show that this coupling dramatically increases the compressive forces that microtubules can sustain, suggesting they can make a more significant structural contribution to the mechanical behavior of the cell than previously thought possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16754957      PMCID: PMC2063890          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200601060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  40 in total

1.  Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model.

Authors:  N Wang; K Naruse; D Stamenović; J J Fredberg; S M Mijailovich; I M Tolić-Nørrelykke; T Polte; R Mannix; D E Ingber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cell prestress. II. Contribution of microtubules.

Authors:  Dimitrije Stamenović; Srboljub M Mijailovich; Iva Marija Tolić-Nørrelykke; Jianxin Chen; Ning Wang
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.249

3.  Scaling the microrheology of living cells.

Authors:  B Fabry; G N Maksym; J P Butler; M Glogauer; D Navajas; J J Fredberg
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2001-09-13       Impact factor: 9.161

Review 4.  Microtubule "plus-end-tracking proteins": The end is just the beginning.

Authors:  S C Schuyler; D Pellman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-05-18       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Structural insights into microtubule function.

Authors:  E Nogales
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 23.643

6.  Opposing views on tensegrity as a structural framework for understanding cell mechanics.

Authors:  D E Ingber
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2000-10

7.  Scanning probe-based frequency-dependent microrheology of polymer gels and biological cells.

Authors:  R E Mahaffy; C K Shih; F C MacKintosh; J Käs
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2000-07-24       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  Eg5 is static in bipolar spindles relative to tubulin: evidence for a static spindle matrix.

Authors:  T M Kapoor; T J Mitchison
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-09-17       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 9.  Mitosis, microtubules, and the matrix.

Authors:  J M Scholey; G C Rogers; D J Sharp
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-07-23       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  A mechanism for nuclear positioning in fission yeast based on microtubule pushing.

Authors:  P T Tran; L Marsh; V Doye; S Inoué; F Chang
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-04-16       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  198 in total

1.  Computational modeling of axonal microtubule bundles under tension.

Authors:  Stephen J Peter; Mohammad R K Mofrad
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Anomalous flexural behaviors of microtubules.

Authors:  Xiaojing Liu; Youhe Zhou; Huajian Gao; Jizeng Wang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Inhibition of cell migration and cell division correlates with distinct effects of microtubule inhibiting drugs.

Authors:  Hailing Yang; Anutosh Ganguly; Fernando Cabral
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Host cell invasion by Toxoplasma gondii is temporally regulated by the host microtubule cytoskeleton.

Authors:  Kristin R Sweeney; Naomi S Morrissette; Stephanie LaChapelle; Ira J Blader
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2010-04-30

Review 5.  Mechanical control of tissue and organ development.

Authors:  Tadanori Mammoto; Donald E Ingber
Journal:  Development       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 6.  Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton.

Authors:  Daniel A Fletcher; R Dyche Mullins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Symmetry, stability, and reversibility properties of idealized confined microtubule cytoskeletons.

Authors:  V I Maly; I V Maly
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Quasi-3D cytoskeletal dynamics of osteocytes under fluid flow.

Authors:  Andrew D Baik; X Lucas Lu; Jun Qiu; Bo Huo; Elizabeth M C Hillman; Cheng Dong; X Edward Guo
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  A nonequilibrium power balance relation for analyzing dissipative filament dynamics.

Authors:  Falko Ziebert; Hervé Mohrbach; Igor M Kulić
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 1.890

10.  Deletion of both centrin 2 (CETN2) and CETN3 destabilizes the distal connecting cilium of mouse photoreceptors.

Authors:  Guoxin Ying; Jeanne M Frederick; Wolfgang Baehr
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.