Literature DB >> 16754242

The distinctiveness heuristic in false recognition and false recall.

David P McCabe1, Anderson D Smith.   

Abstract

The effects of generative processing on false recognition and recall were examined in four experiments using the Deese-Roediger-McDermott false memory paradigm (Deese, 1959; Roediger & McDermott, 1995). In each experiment, a Generate condition in which subjects generated studied words from audio anagrams was compared to a Control condition in which subjects simply listened to studied words presented normally. Rates of false recognition and false recall were lower for critical lures associated with generated lists, than for critical lures associated with control lists, but only in between-subjects designs. False recall and recognition did not differ when generate and control conditions were manipulated within-subjects. This pattern of results is consistent with the distinctiveness heuristic (Schacter, Israel, & Racine, 1999), a metamemorial decision-based strategy whereby global changes in decision criteria lead to reductions of false memories. This retrieval-based monitoring mechanism appears to operate in a similar fashion in reducing false recognition and false recall.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16754242     DOI: 10.1080/09658210600624564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  9 in total

1.  Generation and mnemonic encoding induce a mirror effect in the DRM paradigm.

Authors:  Raymond W Guntre; Glen E Bodner; Tanjeem Azad
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

2.  Distinctive encoding of a subset of DRM lists yields not only benefits, but also costs and spillovers.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Glen E Bodner; Matthew R Gretz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-08-28

3.  Item-specific processing reduces false recognition in older and younger adults: Separating encoding and retrieval using signal detection and the diffusion model.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Andrew J Aschenbrenner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-11

4.  Adaptive constructive processes: An episodic specificity induction impacts false recall in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.

Authors:  Preston P Thakral; Kevin P Madore; Aleea L Devitt; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-03-04

5.  Memory as discrimination: what distraction reveals.

Authors:  C Philip Beaman; Maciej Hanczakowski; Helen M Hodgetts; John E Marsh; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-11

6.  Effects of distinctive encoding on correct and false memory: a meta-analytic review of costs and benefits and their origins in the DRM paradigm.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Glen E Bodner; Jonathan M Fawcett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

7.  Erroneous and veridical recall are not two sides of the same coin: Evidence from semantic distraction in free recall.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Robert W Hughes; Patrik Sörqvist; C Philip Beaman; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Sleep Supports the Slow Abstraction of Gist from Visual Perceptual Memories.

Authors:  Nicolas D Lutz; Susanne Diekelmann; Patricia Hinse-Stern; Jan Born; Karsten Rauss
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Reducing False Recognition in the Deese-Roediger/McDermott Paradigm: Related Lures Reveal How Distinctive Encoding Improves Encoding and Monitoring Processes.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Glen E Bodner; Matthew R Gretz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.