Literature DB >> 16753406

Prediction of postoperative sexual function after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Uwe H G Michl1, Martin G Friedrich, Markus Graefen, Alexander Haese, Hans Heinzer, Hartwig Huland.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Preservation of sexual function is one of the main objectives in radical prostatectomy. We assessed possible predictive factors for postoperative sexual function including preoperative International Index of Erectile Function score, age and extent of nerve sparing procedures for more precise preoperative counseling of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2001 a total of 694 patients with clinically organ confined prostate cancer underwent nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. Preoperative erectile function was assessed with the International Index of Erectile Function score. After at least 12 months of followup patients were asked to answer the International Index of Erectile Function and Quality of Life Questionnaire C 30 via mail.
RESULTS: A total of 411 patients responded to the questionnaire, 122 of whom underwent unilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy and 289 underwent bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. Data on preoperative and postoperative International Index of Erectile Function scores were available for 389 patients. Data on the International Index of Erectile Function and the postoperative Quality of Life Questionnaire C 30 were available for 382 patients. The median decrease in International Index of Erectile Function score was 7 points. Patients undergoing unilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy had a significantly stronger decrease in International Index of Erectile Function score compared to patients undergoing the bilateral nerve sparing procedure (12 vs 6 points). Preoperative International Index of Erectile Function score and extent of nerve sparing (unilateral vs bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy) were significantly associated with better postoperative sexual function whereas age was not. Based on preoperative International Index of Erectile Function score, surgical technique and age, the likelihood of postoperative satisfactory erectile function can be defined preoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed the impact of the extent of nerve sparing (unilateral vs bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy) and highlighted the effect of preoperative erectile function as measured by the International Index of Erectile Function and age at surgery on postoperative sexual function. Our data can be used for counseling patients undergoing radical nerve sparing prostatectomy regarding recovery of erectile function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16753406     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00632-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  19 in total

1.  Prediction of erectile function following treatment for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Meredith M Regan; Matthew R Cooperberg; John T Wei; Jeff M Michalski; Howard M Sandler; Larry Hembroff; Natalia Sadetsky; Christopher S Saigal; Mark S Litwin; Eric Klein; Adam S Kibel; Daniel A Hamstra; Louis L Pisters; Deborah A Kuban; Irving D Kaplan; David P Wood; Jay Ciezki; Rodney L Dunn; Peter R Carroll; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Combination surgery for erectile dysfunction and male incontinence.

Authors:  Dominic Lee; O Lenaine Westney; Run Wang
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Basic principles of anatomy for optimal surgical treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jochen Walz; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Identification of the prostate cancer index lesion by real-time elastography: considerations for focal therapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jochen Walz; Myriam Marcy; Jeanne Thomassin Pianna; Serge Brunelle; Gwenaelle Gravis; Naji Salem; Franck Bladou
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  [Sexuality of couples 5 years after radical prostatectomy. Sexuality of patients and their partners 1 year postoperatively in sexually active couples].

Authors:  T B Jordan; R Ernst; G Hatzichristodoulou; A Dinkel; T Klorek; C Beyrle; J E Gschwend; K Herkommer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy-long-term recurrence-free survival rates for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Felix K-H Chun; Markus Graefen; Mario Zacharias; Alexander Haese; Thomas Steuber; Thorsten Schlomm; Jochen Walz; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Hartwig Huland
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Erectile function recovery rate after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Raanan Tal; Hannah H Alphs; Paul Krebs; Christian J Nelson; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 8.  Extended lymph node dissection for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stephan Jeschke; Fiona C Burkhard; Ramesh Thurairaja; Nivedita Dhar; Urs E Studer
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Functional outcomes following robotic prostatectomy using athermal, traction free risk-stratified grades of nerve sparing.

Authors:  Ashutosh K Tewari; Adnan Ali; Sheela Metgud; Nithin Theckumparampil; Abhishek Srivastava; Francesca Khani; Brian D Robinson; Naveen Gumpeni; Maria M Shevchuk; Matthieu Durand; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Jinyi Li; Robert Leung; Alexandra Peyser; Siobhan Gruschow; Vinita Asija; Niyati Harneja
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Counseling patients about sexual health when considering post-prostatectomy radiation treatment.

Authors:  D Wittmann; J E Montie; D A Hamstra; H Sandler; D P Wood
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 2.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.