Literature DB >> 16753020

Association of geometric factors and failure load level with the distribution of cervical vs. trochanteric hip fractures.

Pasi Pulkkinen1, Felix Eckstein, Eva-Maria Lochmüller, Volker Kuhn, Timo Jämsä.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We experimentally studied the distribution of hip fracture types at different structural mechanical strength. Femoral neck fractures were dominant at the lowest structural strength levels, whereas trochanteric fractures were more common at high failure loads. The best predictor of fracture type across all failure loads and in both sexes was the neck-shaft angle.
INTRODUCTION: Bone geometry has been shown to be a potential risk factor for osteoporotic fractures. Risk factors have been shown to differ between cervical and trochanteric hip fractures. However, the determinants of cervical and trochanteric fractures at different levels of structural mechanical strength are currently unknown. In addition, it is not known if the distribution of fracture types differs between sexes. The aim of this experimental study on excised femora was to investigate whether there exist differences in the distribution of cervical and trochanteric fractures between different structural mechanical strength levels and different sexes and to identify the geometric determinants that predict a fracture type.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample was comprised of 140 cadavers (77 females: mean age, 81.7 years; 63 males: mean age, 79.1 years) from whom the left femora were excised for analysis. The bones were radiographed, and geometrical parameters were determined from the digitized X-rays. The femora were mechanically tested in a side impact configuration, simulating a sideways fall. After the mechanical test, the fracture patterns were classified into cervical and trochanteric.
RESULTS: The overall proportion of cervical fractures was higher in females (74%) than in males (49%) (p = 0.002). The fracture type distribution differed significantly across load quartiles in females (p = 0.025), but not in males (p = 0.205). At the lowest load quartiles, 94.7% of fractures in female and 62.5% in males were femoral neck fractures. At the highest quartiles, in contrast, only 52.6% of fractures in females and 33.3% in males were cervical fractures. Among geometric variables, the neck-shaft angle was the best predictor of fracture type, with higher values in subjects with cervical fractures. This finding was made in females (p < 0.001) and males (p = 0.02) and was consistent across all failure load quartiles.
CONCLUSIONS: Femoral neck fractures predominate at the lowest structural mechanical strength levels, whereas trochanteric fractures are more common at high failure loads. Females are more susceptible to femoral neck fractures than males. The best predictor of fracture type across all structural strength levels and both sexes was the neck-shaft angle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16753020     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.060305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  24 in total

1.  Development of a parametric finite element model of the proximal femur using statistical shape and density modelling.

Authors:  Daniel P Nicolella; Todd L Bredbenner
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 1.763

Review 2.  Sideways fall-induced impact force and its effect on hip fracture risk: a review.

Authors:  M Nasiri Sarvi; Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Factors associated with proximal femur fracture determined in a large cadaveric cohort.

Authors:  Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Timothy L Rossman; Asghar Rezaei; Kent D Carlson; David F Kallmes; John A Skinner; Sundeep Khosla; Shreyasee Amin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Femoral neck shaft angle width is associated with hip-fracture risk in males but not independently of femoral neck bone density.

Authors:  C Ripamonti; L Lisi; M Avella
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Difference in the trajectory of change in bone geometry as measured by hip structural analysis in the narrow neck, intertrochanteric region, and femoral shaft between men and women following hip fracture.

Authors:  Alan M Rathbun; Michelle Shardell; Denise Orwig; J Richard Hebel; Gregory E Hicks; Thomas J Beck; Jay Magaziner; Marc C Hochberg
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  BMD T-score discriminates trochanteric fractures from unfractured controls, whereas geometry discriminates cervical fracture cases from unfractured controls of similar BMD.

Authors:  P Pulkkinen; J Partanen; P Jalovaara; T Jämsä
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Experimental hip fracture load can be predicted from plain radiography by combined analysis of trabecular bone structure and bone geometry.

Authors:  P Pulkkinen; T Jämsä; E-M Lochmüller; V Kuhn; M T Nieminen; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Influence of bone mineral density and hip geometry on the different types of hip fracture.

Authors:  Yizhong Li; Jinkuang Lin; Siqing Cai; Lisheng Yan; Yuancheng Pan; Xuedong Yao; Huafeng Zhuang; Peiwen Wang; Yanjun Zeng
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 3.363

9.  Femoral bone strength and its relation to cortical and trabecular changes after treatment with PTH, alendronate, and their combination as assessed by finite element analysis of quantitative CT scans.

Authors:  Tony M Keaveny; Paul F Hoffmann; Mandeep Singh; Lisa Palermo; John P Bilezikian; Susan L Greenspan; Dennis M Black
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Anatomical variance in acetabular anteversion does not predict hip fracture patterns in the elderly: a retrospective study in 135 patients.

Authors:  Megan Y Kamath; Nathan W Coleman; Stephen M Belkoff; Simon C Mears
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2011-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.