Literature DB >> 16751248

Computed pore potentials of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.

Robert H Meltzer1, Wanda Vila-Carriles, Jerry O Ebalunode, James M Briggs, Steen E Pedersen.   

Abstract

Electrostatic surface potentials in the vestibule of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) were computed from structural models using the University of Houston Brownian Dynamics program to determine their effect on ion conduction and ionic selectivity. To further determine whether computed potentials accurately reflect the electrostatic environment of the channel, the potentials were used to predict the rate constants for diffusion-enhanced fluorescence energy transfer; the calculated energy transfer rates are directly comparable with those determined experimentally (see companion article by Meltzer et al. in this issue). To include any effects on the local potentials by the bound acceptor fluorophore crystal violet, its binding site was first localized within the pore by fluorescence energy transfer measurements from dansyl-C6-choline bound to the agonist sites and also by simulations of binding using Autodock. To compare the computed potentials with those determined experimentally, we used the predicted energy transfer rates from Tb3+ chelates of varying charge to calculate an expected potential using the Boltzmann relationship. This expected potential (from -20 to -40 mV) overestimates the values determined experimentally (from -10 to -25 mV) by two- to fourfold at similar conditions of ionic strength. Although the results indicate a basic discrepancy between experimental and computed surface potentials, both methods demonstrate that the vestibular potential has a relatively small effect on conduction and selectivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16751248      PMCID: PMC1518625          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.081455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  34 in total

1.  How pore mouth charge distributions alter the permeability of transmembrane ionic channels.

Authors:  P C Jordan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Ion-channel entrances influence permeation. Net charge, size, shape, and binding considerations.

Authors:  J A Dani
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  The orientational freedom of molecular probes. The orientation factor in intramolecular energy transfer.

Authors:  R E Dale; J Eisinger; W E Blumberg
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Fluorescence energy transfer between cobra alpha-toxin molecules bound to the acetylcholine receptor.

Authors:  D A Johnson; J G Voet; P Taylor
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1984-05-10       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Primary structure of alpha-subunit precursor of Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor deduced from cDNA sequence.

Authors:  M Noda; H Takahashi; T Tanabe; M Toyosato; Y Furutani; T Hirose; M Asai; S Inayama; T Miyata; S Numa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Diffusion-enhanced lanthanide energy-transfer study of DNA-bound cobalt(III) bleomycins: comparisons of accessibility and electrostatic potential with DNA complexes of ethidium and acridine orange.

Authors:  T G Wensel; C H Chang; C F Meares
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1985-06-04       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Structural homology of Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor subunits.

Authors:  M Noda; H Takahashi; T Tanabe; M Toyosato; S Kikyotani; Y Furutani; T Hirose; H Takashima; S Inayama; T Miyata; S Numa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Rings of negatively charged amino acids determine the acetylcholine receptor channel conductance.

Authors:  K Imoto; C Busch; B Sakmann; M Mishina; T Konno; J Nakai; H Bujo; Y Mori; K Fukuda; S Numa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Distance between the agonist and noncompetitive inhibitor sites on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.

Authors:  J M Herz; D A Johnson; P Taylor
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1989-07-25       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Amino acids of the Torpedo marmorata acetylcholine receptor alpha subunit labeled by a photoaffinity ligand for the acetylcholine binding site.

Authors:  M Dennis; J Giraudat; F Kotzyba-Hibert; M Goeldner; C Hirth; J Y Chang; C Lazure; M Chrétien; J P Changeux
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1988-04-05       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  6 in total

1.  Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channel electrostatics determined by diffusion-enhanced luminescence energy transfer.

Authors:  Robert H Meltzer; Monica M Lurtz; Theodore G Wensel; Steen E Pedersen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Electrostatic steering at acetylcholine binding sites.

Authors:  Robert H Meltzer; Errol Thompson; Kizhake V Soman; Xing-Zhi Song; Jerry O Ebalunode; Theodore G Wensel; James M Briggs; Steen E Pedersen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Recalled to life: resurrection of diffusion-enhanced fluorescence energy transfer.

Authors:  Robert H Fairclough
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  A paramagnetic molecular voltmeter.

Authors:  Jack T Surek; David D Thomas
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 5.  Structural answers and persistent questions about how nicotinic receptors work.

Authors:  Gregg B Wells
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2008-05-01

6.  Rings of charge within the extracellular vestibule influence ion permeation of the 5-HT3A receptor.

Authors:  Matthew R Livesey; Michelle A Cooper; Jeremy J Lambert; John A Peters
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 5.157

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.