Literature DB >> 16751249

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channel electrostatics determined by diffusion-enhanced luminescence energy transfer.

Robert H Meltzer1, Monica M Lurtz, Theodore G Wensel, Steen E Pedersen.   

Abstract

The electrostatic potentials within the pore of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) were determined using lanthanide-based diffusion-enhanced fluorescence energy transfer experiments. Freely diffusing Tb3+ -chelates of varying charge constituted a set of energy transfer donors to the acceptor, crystal violet, a noncompetitive antagonist of the nAChR. Energy transfer from a neutral Tb3+ -chelate to nAChR-bound crystal violet was reduced 95% relative to the energy transfer to free crystal violet. This result indicated that crystal violet was strongly shielded from solvent when bound to the nAChR. Comparison of energy transfer from positively and negatively charged chelates indicate negative electrostatic potentials of -25 mV in the channel, measured in low ionic strength, and -10 mV measured in physiological ionic strength. Debye-Hückel analyses of potentials determined at various ionic strengths were consistent with 1-2 negative charges within 8 A of the crystal violet binding site. To complement the energy transfer experiments, the influence of pH and ionic strength on the binding of [3H]phencyclidine were determined. The ionic strength dependence of binding affinity was consistent with -3.3 charges within 8 A of the binding site, according to Debye-Hückel analysis. The pH dependence of binding had an apparent pKa of 7.2, a value indicative of a potential near -170 mV if the titratable residues are constituted of aspartates and glutamates. It is concluded that long-range potentials are small and likely contribute little to selectivity or conductance whereas close interactions are more likely to contribute to electrostatic stabilization of ions and binding of noncompetitive antagonists within the channel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16751249      PMCID: PMC1518635          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.081448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  34 in total

1.  Quantum yields of luminescent lanthanide chelates and far-red dyes measured by resonance energy transfer.

Authors:  M Xiao; P R Selvin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-07-25       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor at 4.6 A resolution: transverse tunnels in the channel wall.

Authors:  A Miyazawa; Y Fujiyoshi; M Stowell; N Unwin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-05-14       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Location of ligand-binding sites on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha-subunit.

Authors:  S E Pedersen; E B Dreyer; J B Cohen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1986-10-15       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  How pore mouth charge distributions alter the permeability of transmembrane ionic channels.

Authors:  P C Jordan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Location of a delta-subunit region determining ion transport through the acetylcholine receptor channel.

Authors:  K Imoto; C Methfessel; B Sakmann; M Mishina; Y Mori; T Konno; K Fukuda; M Kurasaki; H Bujo; Y Fujita
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Dec 18-31       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Electrostatic steering and ionic tethering in enzyme-ligand binding: insights from simulations.

Authors:  R C Wade; R R Gabdoulline; S K Lüdemann; V Lounnas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Aminotriarylmethane dyes are high-affinity noncompetitive antagonists of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.

Authors:  M M Lurtz; S E Pedersen
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.436

8.  Diffusion-enhanced lanthanide energy-transfer study of DNA-bound cobalt(III) bleomycins: comparisons of accessibility and electrostatic potential with DNA complexes of ethidium and acridine orange.

Authors:  T G Wensel; C H Chang; C F Meares
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1985-06-04       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Structure and gating mechanism of the acetylcholine receptor pore.

Authors:  Atsuo Miyazawa; Yoshinori Fujiyoshi; Nigel Unwin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Monovalent and divalent cation permeation in acetylcholine receptor channels. Ion transport related to structure.

Authors:  J A Dani; G Eisenman
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  9 in total

1.  Computed pore potentials of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.

Authors:  Robert H Meltzer; Wanda Vila-Carriles; Jerry O Ebalunode; James M Briggs; Steen E Pedersen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Electrostatic steering at acetylcholine binding sites.

Authors:  Robert H Meltzer; Errol Thompson; Kizhake V Soman; Xing-Zhi Song; Jerry O Ebalunode; Theodore G Wensel; James M Briggs; Steen E Pedersen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Recalled to life: resurrection of diffusion-enhanced fluorescence energy transfer.

Authors:  Robert H Fairclough
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Charges in the cytoplasmic pore control intrinsic inward rectification and single-channel properties in Kir1.1 and Kir2.1 channels.

Authors:  Hsueh-Kai Chang; Shih-Hao Yeh; Ru-Chi Shieh
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 1.843

5.  In glycine and GABA(A) channels, different subunits contribute asymmetrically to channel conductance via residues in the extracellular domain.

Authors:  Mirko Moroni; James O Meyer; Carolina Lahmann; Lucia G Sivilotti
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  A paramagnetic molecular voltmeter.

Authors:  Jack T Surek; David D Thomas
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 7.  Structural answers and persistent questions about how nicotinic receptors work.

Authors:  Gregg B Wells
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2008-05-01

8.  FRET in Membrane Biophysics: An Overview.

Authors:  Luís M S Loura; Manuel Prieto
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  A Broad G Protein-Coupled Receptor Internalization Assay that Combines SNAP-Tag Labeling, Diffusion-Enhanced Resonance Energy Transfer, and a Highly Emissive Terbium Cryptate.

Authors:  Angélique Levoye; Jurriaan M Zwier; Agnieszka Jaracz-Ros; Laurence Klipfel; Martin Cottet; Damien Maurel; Sara Bdioui; Karl Balabanian; Laurent Prézeau; Eric Trinquet; Thierry Durroux; Françoise Bachelerie
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 5.555

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.