Literature DB >> 16741458

Determinants for improvement in different back pain measures and their influence on the duration of sickness absence.

Elske Faber1, Alex Burdorf, Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra, Harald S Miedema, Bart W Koes.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the determinants for improvement in pain, functional limitations, and quality of life in low back pain (LBP) patients, and to evaluate whether return to work (RTW) can be predicted by these factors and associated improvement in health-related aspects. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It is unclear to what extent prognostic factors for the course of LBP and consequent functional limitations are similar to prognostic factors for RTW.
METHODS: A total of 103 LBP patients on sickness absence for 3 to 12 weeks filled out three questionnaires: at inclusion, and after 3 and 6 months. Information on the duration of sickness absence was gathered from occupational health services.
RESULTS: Different personal characteristics determined pain, functional limitations, and quality of life at baseline. These dimensions all improved over time, significantly during the first 3 months. Working at 3 months had a positive impact on all three dimensions. In the multivariate model, RTW was positively associated with male gender and recurrent LBP, whereas it was negatively associated with the level of functional limitations at baseline.
CONCLUSION: Except for male gender, the primary determinants for improvement in pain, functional limitations, and quality of life were not associated with RTW. Although there is a large coherence in the improvement in the outcome measures, RTW seems primarily determined by the level of experienced functional limitations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16741458     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000219873.84232.26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of risk factors predicting return to work between patients with subacute and chronic non-specific low back pain: systematic review.

Authors:  C A M Heitz; R Hilfiker; L M Bachmann; H Joronen; T Lorenz; D Uebelhart; A Klipstein; Florian Brunner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  How do we define the condition 'recurrent low back pain'? A systematic review.

Authors:  Tasha R Stanton; Jane Latimer; Chris G Maher; Mark J Hancock
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Defining gender disparities in pain management.

Authors:  Linda Leresche
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A screening questionnaire to predict no return to work within 3 months for low back pain claimants.

Authors:  Marc Du Bois; Peter Donceel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The prognosis of acute and persistent low-back pain: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luciola da C Menezes Costa; Christopher G Maher; Mark J Hancock; James H McAuley; Robert D Herbert; Leonardo O P Costa
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Predicting outcomes of acute low back pain patients in emergency department: A prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Celia Ia Choo Tan; Jennifer Suet Ching Liaw; Bo Jiang; Sohil Equbal Pothiawala; Huihua Li; Mark Kwok Fai Leong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.