Literature DB >> 16741241

Evaluation of methods for sequence analysis of highly repetitive DNA templates.

John W Hawes1, Kevin L Knudtson, Helaman Escobar, George S Grills, Timothy C Hunter, Emily Jackson-Machelski, Heather Lin, David S Needleman, Rashmi Pershad, Glenis J Wiebe.   

Abstract

The DNA Sequencing Research Group (DSRG) of the ABRF conducted a study to assess the ability of DNA sequencing core facilities to successfully sequence a set of well-defined templates containing difficult repeats. The aim of this study was to determine whether repetitive templates could be sequenced accurately by using equipment and chemistries currently utilized in participating sequencing laboratories. The effects of primer and template concentrations, sequencing chemistries, additives, and instrument formats on the ability to successfully sequence repeat elements were examined. The first part of this study was an analysis of the results of 361 chromatograms from participants representing 40 different laboratories who attempted to sequence a panel of difficult-to-sequence templates using their best in-house protocols. The second part of this study was a smaller multi-laboratory evaluation of a single robust protocol with the same panel of templates. This study provides a measure of the potential success of different approaches to sequencing across homopolymer tracts and repetitive elements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16741241      PMCID: PMC2291771     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Tech        ISSN: 1524-0215


  11 in total

Review 1.  New DNA sequencing methods.

Authors:  A Marziali; M Akeson
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.590

Review 2.  Automation for genomics, part two: sequencers, microarrays, and future trends.

Authors:  D Meldrum
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Sequencing of difficult templates containing poly(A/T) tracts: closure of sequence gaps.

Authors:  J E Langan; L Rowbottom; T Liloglou; J K Field; J M Risk
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.993

4.  Technical notes for sequencing difficult templates.

Authors:  David Stirling
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2003

5.  New protocols for DNA sequencing with dye terminators.

Authors:  A Rosenthal; D S Charnock-Jones
Journal:  DNA Seq       Date:  1992

6.  Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment.

Authors:  B Ewing; L Hillier; M C Wendl; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities.

Authors:  B Ewing; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Sequencing homopolymer tracts and repetitive elements.

Authors:  C M Robbins; E Hsu; P M Gillevet
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.993

9.  Accuracy of automated DNA sequencing: a multi-laboratory comparison of sequencing results.

Authors:  C W Naeve; G A Buck; R L Niece; R T Pon; M Robertson; A J Smith
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.993

10.  Linear amplification sequencing with dye terminators.

Authors:  A Rosenthal; D S Charnock-Jones
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  1993
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  A Review of the Scientific Rigor, Reproducibility, and Transparency Studies Conducted by the ABRF Research Groups.

Authors:  Sheenah M Mische; Nancy C Fisher; Susan M Meyn; Katia Sol-Church; Rebecca L Hegstad-Davies; Frances Weis-Garcia; Marie Adams; John M Ashton; Kym M Delventhal; Julie A Dragon; Laura Holmes; Pratik Jagtap; Kristopher E Kubow; Christopher E Mason; Magnus Palmblad; Brian C Searle; Christoph W Turck; Kevin L Knudtson
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2020-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.