Literature DB >> 16735581

The effect of gamma irradiation on anterior cruciate ligament allograft biomechanical and biochemical properties in the caprine model at time zero and at 6 months after surgery.

Herbert E Schwartz1, Matthew J Matava, Frank S Proch, Charles A Butler, Anthony Ratcliffe, Martin Levy, David L Butler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High levels of gamma irradiation are required to eliminate the risk of bacterial and viral transmission during implantation of musculoskeletal allografts. The effects of high levels of gamma irradiation on anterior cruciate ligament allograft biomechanics are still not known. HYPOTHESIS: High-dose gamma irradiation (4 Mrad) adversely affects anterior cruciate ligament allograft biomechanics at surgery and at 6 months after surgery and affects biochemistry at 6 months. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Bilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions were performed in 18 adult goats, with one knee receiving an irradiated patellar tendon allograft (4 Mrad) and the other receiving a frozen control allograft (0 Mrad). In 6 recipients (time zero group), graft pairs were tested immediately after sacrifice, and load relaxation of the femur-allograft-tibia preparation was measured during cyclic anterior displacement. Twelve recipients received bilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions, staged 2 months apart, and were sacrificed a mean of 6 months postoperatively. Load relaxation and tensile failure testing were performed, followed by allograft biochemistry assessment.
RESULTS: At time zero, irradiated grafts showed less load relaxation than did contralateral controls, but by 6 months, the trend had reversed because of decreases in control graft relaxation, with no changes in irradiated graft relaxation. By 6 months, irradiated grafts showed lower stiffness and maximum force compared to controls but no differences in modulus, maximum stress, or biochemistry.
CONCLUSION: High levels of gamma irradiation affect anterior cruciate ligament allograft subfailure viscoelastic and structural properties but not material or biochemical properties over time. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although high levels of gamma irradiation may inactivate infectious agents, this treatment is not a feasible clinical option because of altered allograft biomechanics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16735581     DOI: 10.1177/0363546506288851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  26 in total

1.  Biomechanics of the goat three bundle anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  T Tischer; M Ronga; A Tsai; S J M Ingham; M Ekdahl; P Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Graft healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Max Ekdahl; James H-C Wang; Mario Ronga; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with BPTB autograft, irradiated versus non-irradiated allograft: a prospective randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Kang Sun; Shaoqi Tian; Jihua Zhang; Changsuo Xia; Cailong Zhang; Tengbo Yu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Biomechanical and tissue handling property comparison of decellularized and cryopreserved tibialis anterior tendons following extreme incubation and rehydration.

Authors:  J Nyland; N Larsen; R Burden; H Chang; D N M Caborn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  What Factors Influence the Biomechanical Properties of Allograft Tissue for ACL Reconstruction? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Drew A Lansdown; Andrew J Riff; Molly Meadows; Adam B Yanke; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Does sterilization with fractionated electron beam irradiation prevent ACL tendon allograft from tissue damage?

Authors:  T Schmidt; D Grabau; J H Grotewohl; U Gohs; A Pruß; M Smith; S Scheffler; A Hoburg
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Magnetic resonance measurements of tissue quantity and quality using T2 * relaxometry predict temporal changes in the biomechanical properties of the healing ACL.

Authors:  Jillian E Beveridge; Jason T Machan; Edward G Walsh; Ata M Kiapour; Naga Padmini Karamchedu; Kaitlyn E Chin; Benedikt L Proffen; Jakob T Sieker; Martha M Murray; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 8.  Evolving strategies in mechanobiology to more effectively treat damaged musculoskeletal tissues.

Authors:  David L Butler; Nathaniel A Dyment; Jason T Shearn; Kirsten R C Kinneberg; Andrew P Breidenbach; Andrea L Lalley; Steven D Gilday; Cynthia Gooch; M B Rao; Chia-feng Liu; Christopher Wylie
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  ACL reconstruction with BPTB autograft and irradiated fresh frozen allograft.

Authors:  Kang Sun; Shao-qi Tian; Ji-hua Zhang; Chang-suo Xia; Cai-long Zhang; Teng-bo Yu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.066

10.  Evaluation criteria for musculoskeletal and craniofacial tissue engineering constructs: a conference report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.