Literature DB >> 16735262

A vision of the future of newborn screening.

Duane Alexander1, Peter C van Dyck.   

Abstract

In 40 years, newborn screening has evolved to become a standard component of preventive public health. Despite its widespread acceptance, efforts need to be made to overcome some significant problems. There is inequity in the conditions for which states screen routinely, and many conditions that could be screened for are not, for economic or logistic reasons. Existing (tandem mass spectrometry) and potential (DNA microarray) technologies could be developed and put in place to correct these existing shortcomings. To do so will require investment in the technologies, combined with public and professional education and provision of a high-quality, accessible system for confirmation of diagnoses, family counseling, initiation of treatment, and the opportunity to participate in research to develop new or improved therapies.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16735262     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-2633O

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  27 in total

1.  Health-care providers' views on pursuing reproductive benefit through newborn screening: the case of sickle cell disorders.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Fiona A Miller; Robin Z Hayeems; Brenda J Wilson; June C Carroll; Martha Paynter; Julian Little; Judith Allanson; Jessica P Bytautas; Pranesh Chakraborty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Reply to Ross' commentary: Reproductive benefit through newborn screening: preferences, policy and ethics.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Fiona A Miller
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Debating clinical utility.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; A-M Laberge; N Press
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 4.  Potential Uses and Inherent Challenges of Using Genome-Scale Sequencing to Augment Current Newborn Screening.

Authors:  Jonathan S Berg; Cynthia M Powell
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 6.915

5.  Introducing new screens: why are we all doing different things?

Authors:  R J Pollitt
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 4.982

6.  Newborn screening: experiences in the Middle East and North Africa.

Authors:  A A Saadallah; M S Rashed
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 4.982

7.  The expansion of newborn screening: is reproductive benefit an appropriate pursuit?

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Fiona A Miller; Robin Z Hayeems; Denise Avard; Bartha M Knoppers; Martina C Cornel; Pascal Borry
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 8.  Genetic screening.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Beth Tarini; Nancy A Press; James P Evans
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 9.  Reconsidering reproductive benefit through newborn screening: a systematic review of guidelines on preconception, prenatal and newborn screening.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Fiona A Miller; Robin Z Hayeems; Denise Avard; Bartha M Knoppers
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 10.  Dangerous and expensive screening and treatment for rare childhood diseases: the case of Krabbe disease.

Authors:  John D Lantos
Journal:  Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2011
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.