Literature DB >> 16734392

Effect of the Women's Health Initiative on osteoporosis therapy and expenditure in Medicaid.

Jacob A Udell1, Michael A Fischer, M Alan Brookhart, Daniel H Solomon, Niteesh K Choudhry.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Decreasing HRT use among postmenopausal women may have a reciprocal impact on other osteoporosis therapy. Time series analysis of prescribing trends for millions of Medicaid beneficiaries revealed a 57% decline in HRT without augmenting the pace of bisphosphonate use. Prescribing changes dramatically increased Medicaid spending on osteoporosis therapy over the last decade and requires further evaluation of cost effectiveness.
INTRODUCTION: Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has been commonly prescribed to postmenopausal women, but its use is decreasing because adverse cardiac outcomes were reported by the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) in July 2002. The reciprocal impact of the WHI on other osteoporosis medications use and expenditure is unknown.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a time series analysis on prescription data from 50 state Medicaid programs between 1995 and 2004. Five medication categories were used: HRT, bisphosphonates, calcium, calcitonin, and raloxifene.
RESULTS: HRT was increasing before publication of the WHI, reaching 5 million prescriptions per year by mid-2002 (136 prescriptions per 1000 beneficiaries). Bisphosphonate prescribing rose in parallel until mid-2002. WHI publication was associated with a rapid reduction in HRT use, declining 57% by mid-2004 to an average of 59 prescriptions per 1000 beneficiaries (p = 0.01). WHI publication did not augment bisphosphonates' nearly linear rate of rise (p = 0.43) as their prescribing pace continued, whereas HRT declined. Medicaid spending on osteoporosis therapy also changed dramatically during the last decade, as yearly expenditure increased 664% from 1465 US dollars to 9742 US dollars per 1000 beneficiaries. Over this period, a significant shift from daily to weekly bisphosphonates also occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: A dramatic decline in HRT and continued rise in bisphosphonate prescribing has occurred since the publication of the WHI. During this time, there have also been substantial increases in osteoporosis medication spending within Medicaid. Determining whether these trends are clinically appropriate and cost effective for osteoporosis therapy will have important implications for the development of future drug reimbursement programs, especially for elderly patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16734392     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.060119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  24 in total

1.  Long-term effect of the Women's Health Initiative study on antiosteoporosis medication prescribing.

Authors:  Euni Lee; Mary K Maneno; Anthony K Wutoh; Ilene H Zuckerman
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Exposure to oral bisphosphonates and risk of cancer.

Authors:  Chris R Cardwell; Christian C Abnet; Philip Veal; Carmel M Hughes; Marie M Cantwell; Liam J Murray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Comparison of direct health care costs related to the pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis and to the management of osteoporotic fractures among compliant and noncompliant users of alendronate and risedronate: a population-based study.

Authors:  J Blouin; A Dragomir; M Fredette; L-G Ste-Marie; J C Fernandes; S Perreault
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Nutrition and aging. The Carla Workshop.

Authors:  G Abellan van Kan; G Gambassi; L C P G M de Groot; S Andrieu; T Cederholm; E André; J P Caubère; J P Bonjour; P Ritz; A Salva; A Sinclair; B Vellas; J Daydé; J Deregnaucourt; C Latgé
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2008 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 4.075

5.  Comparative gastrointestinal safety of weekly oral bisphosphonates.

Authors:  S M Cadarette; J N Katz; M A Brookhart; T Stürmer; M R Stedman; R Levin; D H Solomon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Osteoporosis Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, and Screening in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Giovanni Adami; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  Secondary prevention of osteoporosis in Australia: analysis of government-dispensed prescription data.

Authors:  Samantha A Hollingworth; Inong Gunanti; Lisa M Nissen; Emma L Duncan
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Bisphosphonate use and risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefanos Bonovas; Georgios Nikolopoulos; Pantelis Bagos
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Clinical performance of osteoporosis risk assessment tools in women aged 67 years and older.

Authors:  M L Gourlay; J M Powers; L-Y Lui; K E Ensrud
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  The osteoporosis revolution marches on.

Authors:  Lawrence G Raisz
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 1.601

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.