SUMMARY: Weekly bisphosphonates are the primary agents used to treat osteoporosis. Although these agents are generally well tolerated, serious gastrointestinal adverse events, including hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleed, may arise. We compared the gastrointestinal safety between weekly alendronate and weekly risedronate and found no important difference between new users of these agents. INTRODUCTION: Weekly bisphosphonates are the primary agents prescribed for osteoporosis. We examined the comparative gastrointestinal safety between weekly bisphosphonates. METHODS: We studied new users of weekly alendronate and weekly risedronate from June 2002 to August 2005 among enrollees in a state-wide pharmaceutical benefit program for seniors. Our primary outcome was hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal bleed. Secondary outcomes included outpatient diagnoses for upper gastrointestinal disease, symptoms, endoscopic procedures, use of gastroprotective agents, and switching between therapies. We used Cox proportional hazard models to compare outcomes between agents within 120 days of treatment initiation, adjusting for propensity score quintiles. We also examined composite safety outcomes and stratified results by age and prior gastrointestinal history. RESULTS: A total of 10,420 new users were studied, mean age = 79 years (SD, 6.9), and 95% women. We observed 31 hospitalizations for upper gastrointestinal bleed (0.91 per 100 person-years) within 120 days of treatment initiation. Adjusting for covariates, there was no difference in hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal bleed among those treated with risedronate compared with alendronate (HR, 1.12; 95%CI, 0.55 to 2.28). Risedronate switching rates were lower; otherwise, no differences were observed for secondary or composite outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We found no important difference in gastrointestinal safety between weekly oral bisphosphonates.
SUMMARY: Weekly bisphosphonates are the primary agents used to treat osteoporosis. Although these agents are generally well tolerated, serious gastrointestinal adverse events, including hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleed, may arise. We compared the gastrointestinal safety between weekly alendronate and weekly risedronate and found no important difference between new users of these agents. INTRODUCTION: Weekly bisphosphonates are the primary agents prescribed for osteoporosis. We examined the comparative gastrointestinal safety between weekly bisphosphonates. METHODS: We studied new users of weekly alendronate and weekly risedronate from June 2002 to August 2005 among enrollees in a state-wide pharmaceutical benefit program for seniors. Our primary outcome was hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal bleed. Secondary outcomes included outpatient diagnoses for upper gastrointestinal disease, symptoms, endoscopic procedures, use of gastroprotective agents, and switching between therapies. We used Cox proportional hazard models to compare outcomes between agents within 120 days of treatment initiation, adjusting for propensity score quintiles. We also examined composite safety outcomes and stratified results by age and prior gastrointestinal history. RESULTS: A total of 10,420 new users were studied, mean age = 79 years (SD, 6.9), and 95% women. We observed 31 hospitalizations for upper gastrointestinal bleed (0.91 per 100 person-years) within 120 days of treatment initiation. Adjusting for covariates, there was no difference in hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal bleed among those treated with risedronate compared with alendronate (HR, 1.12; 95%CI, 0.55 to 2.28). Risedronate switching rates were lower; otherwise, no differences were observed for secondary or composite outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We found no important difference in gastrointestinal safety between weekly oral bisphosphonates.
Authors: James G Donahue; K Arnold Chan; Susan E Andrade; Arne Beck; Myde Boles; Diana S M Buist; Vincent J Carey; Julie M Chandler; Gary A Chase; Bruce Ettinger; Paul Fishman; Michael Goodman; Harry A Guess; Jerry H Gurwitz; Andrea Z LaCroix; T R Levin; Richard Platt Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2002-04-22
Authors: Marianne Udd; Pekka Miettinen; Antero Palmu; Markku Heikkinen; Esko Janatuinen; Pentti Pasanen; Riitta Tarvainen; Harri Mustonen; Risto Julkunen Journal: Scand J Gastroenterol Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 2.423
Authors: Alan B R Thomson; John K Marshall; Richard H Hunt; J Mark Provenza; Frank L Lanza; Mary G Royer; Zhengqing Li; Marion A Blank Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Anna N A Tosteson; Margaret R Grove; Cristina S Hammond; Megan M Moncur; G Thomas Ray; Gwen M Hebert; Alice R Pressman; Bruce Ettinger Journal: Am J Med Date: 2003-08-15 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Sebastian Schneeweiss; Philip S Wang; Jerry Avorn; Malcolm Maclure; Raia Levin; Robert J Glynn Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: M Tadrous; L Wong; M M Mamdani; D N Juurlink; M D Krahn; L E Lévesque; S M Cadarette Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2013-11-28 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: J-J Body; P Bergmann; S Boonen; J-P Devogelaer; E Gielen; S Goemaere; J-M Kaufman; S Rozenberg; J-Y Reginster Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2012-02-04 Impact factor: 4.507