Literature DB >> 16733706

Age-related influence of contingencies on a saccade task.

Sandra Jazbec1, Michael G Hardin, Elizabeth Schroth, Erin McClure, Daniel S Pine, Monique Ernst.   

Abstract

Adolescence is characterized by increased risk-taking and sensation-seeking, presumably brought about by developmental changes within reward-mediating brain circuits. A better understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying reward-seeking during adolescence can have critical implications for the development of strategies to enhance adolescent performance in potentially dangerous situations. Yet little research has investigated the influence of age on the modulation of behavior by incentives with neuroscience-based methods. A monetary reward antisaccade task (the RST) was used with 23 healthy adolescents and 30 healthy adults. Performance accuracy, latency and peak velocity of saccade responses (prosaccades and antisaccades) were analyzed. Performance accuracy across all groups was improved by incentives (obtain reward, avoid punishment) for both, prosaccades and antisaccades. However, modulation of antisaccade errors (direction errors) by incentives differed between groups: adolescents modulated saccade latency and peak velocity depending on contingencies, with incentives aligning their performance to that of adults; adults did not show a modulation by incentives. These findings suggest that incentives modulate a global measure of performance (percent direction errors) in adults and adolescents, and exert a more powerful influence on the control of incorrect motor responses in adolescents than in adults. These findings suggest that this task can be used in neuroimaging studies as a probe of the influence of incentives on cognitive control from a developmental perspective as well as in health and disease.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16733706      PMCID: PMC2733163          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0520-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  44 in total

1.  Maturation of widely distributed brain function subserves cognitive development.

Authors:  B Luna; K R Thulborn; D P Munoz; E P Merriam; K E Garver; N J Minshew; M S Keshavan; C R Genovese; W F Eddy; J A Sweeney
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Reward-predicting and reward-detecting neuronal activity in the primate supplementary eye field.

Authors:  N Amador; M Schlag-Rey; J Schlag
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Anaesthesia and saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  O A Khan; S R Taylor; J G Jones
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Modulation of saccadic eye movements by predicted reward outcome.

Authors:  Yoriko Takikawa; Reiko Kawagoe; Hideaki Itoh; Hiroyuki Nakahara; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Cognitive control under contingencies in anxious and depressed adolescents: an antisaccade task.

Authors:  Sandra Jazbec; Erin McClure; Michael Hardin; Daniel S Pine; Monique Ernst
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 6.  Parsing cognition in schizophrenia using saccadic eye movements: a selective overview.

Authors:  A Broerse; T J Crawford; J A den Boer
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Pursuit and saccadic eye movement subregions in human frontal eye field: a high-resolution fMRI investigation.

Authors:  Caterina Rosano; Christine M Krisky; Joel S Welling; William F Eddy; Beatriz Luna; Keith R Thulborn; John A Sweeney
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Development of voluntary control of saccadic eye movements. I. Age-related changes in normal children.

Authors:  J Fukushima; T Hatta; K Fukushima
Journal:  Brain Dev       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.961

9.  Development of prosaccade and antisaccade task performance in participants aged 6 to 26 years.

Authors:  C Klein; F Foerster
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 10.  Structural and functional brain development and its relation to cognitive development.

Authors:  B J Casey; J N Giedd; K M Thomas
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.251

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  A developmental perspective on neuroeconomic mechanisms of contingency management.

Authors:  Catherine Stanger; Alan J Budney; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2012-06-04

Review 2.  Impact of socio-emotional context, brain development, and pubertal maturation on adolescent risk-taking.

Authors:  Ashley R Smith; Jason Chein; Laurence Steinberg
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 3.  Neurobiology of the adolescent brain and behavior: implications for substance use disorders.

Authors:  B J Casey; Rebecca M Jones
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 8.829

4.  Incentive effect on inhibitory control in adolescents with early-life stress: an antisaccade study.

Authors:  Sven C Mueller; Michael G Hardin; Katherine Korelitz; Teresa Daniele; Jessica Bemis; Mary Dozier; Elizabeth Peloso; Francoise S Maheu; Daniel S Pine; Monique Ernst
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2012-03-15

5.  The influence of motivational salience on saccade latencies.

Authors:  Marcus Rothkirch; Florian Ostendorf; Anne-Lene Sax; Philipp Sterzer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Adolescent transformations of behavioral and neural processes as potential targets for prevention.

Authors:  Dana Eldreth; Michael G Hardin; Nevia Pavletic; Monique Ernst
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2013-06

7.  Neuroeconomics and adolescent substance abuse: individual differences in neural networks and delay discounting.

Authors:  Catherine Stanger; Amanda Elton; Stacy R Ryan; G Andrew James; Alan J Budney; Clinton D Kilts
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 8.829

8.  Incentives facilitate developmental improvement in inhibitory control by modulating control-related networks.

Authors:  Michael N Hallquist; Charles F Geier; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Perturbed reward processing in pediatric bipolar disorder: an antisaccade study.

Authors:  Sven C Mueller; Pamela Ng; Veronica Temple; Michael G Hardin; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft; Monique Ernst
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 4.153

10.  Immaturities in reward processing and its influence on inhibitory control in adolescence.

Authors:  C F Geier; R Terwilliger; T Teslovich; K Velanova; B Luna
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.