Literature DB >> 27160728

[What can we learn in future from the data of the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD) in comparison to other registries?].

V Jansson1, A Steinbrück2, J Hassenpflug3.   

Abstract

The German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD) was founded in 2010 and has been in full operation since 2014. Previous attempts at a systematic data collection of elective and non-elective knee and hip replacement in Germany failed mainly because of the long-term lack of funding. The EPRD is an interdisciplinary collaborative partnership between the German Association of Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery (DGOOC), all implant manufacturers of the German Medical Technology Association (BVMed), health insurers (AOK and the Association of Additional Healthcare Insurance) and hospitals (German Hospital Federation). As part of this cooperation a worldwide unique implant database has been set up, which includes all relevant components and a detailed description of implant specifications. This implant library enables a detailed evaluation of implant survival, revision rates and possible inferior implant performance of knee and hip replacements in Germany. At the end of 2015 the EPRD encompassed over 200,000 registered operations. Due to the high number of hip and knee arthroplasties in Germany with many different implants from different manufacturers there will be a rapid growth of data that are available for a national and also international comparison of the results.

Keywords:  Comparison of results; German Arthroplasty Registry; Hip arthroplasty; Implant product library; Knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27160728     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-016-0171-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  11 in total

1.  [Registries as a tool for optimizing safety of endoprostheses. Experiences from other countries and the setup of the German arthroplasty register].

Authors:  Joachim Hassenpflug; Thoralf R Liebs
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  A new universal, standardized implant database for product identification: a unique tool for arthroplasty registries.

Authors:  Wilhelm Blömer; Arnd Steinbrück; Christian Schröder; Franz-Josef Grothaus; Oliver Melsheimer; Henrich Mannel; Gerhard Forkel; Thomas Eilers; Thoralf R Liebs; Joachim Hassenpflug; Volkmar Jansson
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Continuous monitoring of the performance of hip prostheses.

Authors:  S L Hardoon; J D Lewsey; P J Gregg; B C Reeves; J H P van der Meulen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-06

4.  Is a Revision a Revision? An Analysis of National Arthroplasty Registries' Definitions of Revision.

Authors:  Thoralf R Liebs; Farina Splietker; Joachim Hassenpflug
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Large diameter metal on metal articulations. Comparison of total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher M Jack; William L Walter; Andrew J Shimmin; Kara Cashman; Richard N de Steiger
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  [Early detection of systematic defects by endoprostheses registries].

Authors:  T R Liebs; O Melsheimer; J Hassenpflug
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden.

Authors:  P Herberts; H Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Richard N de Steiger; Jacqueline R Hang; Lisa N Miller; Stephen E Graves; David C Davidson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Application and survival curve of total hip arthroplasties: a systematic comparative analysis using worldwide hip arthroplasty registers.

Authors:  Patrick Sadoghi; Christian Schröder; Andreas Fottner; Arnd Steinbrück; Oliver Betz; Peter E Müller; Volkmar Jansson; Andreas Hölzer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Modular titanium alloy neck adapter failures in hip replacement--failure mode analysis and influence of implant material.

Authors:  Thomas M Grupp; Thomas Weik; Wilhelm Bloemer; Hanns-Peter Knaebel
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Does the certification according to EndoCert lead to a better quality of treatment?]

Authors:  P Weber; A C Paulus; D Hallmen; A Steinbrück; F Schmidutz; V Jansson
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.087

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.