Literature DB >> 16717010

Identification of systems failures in successful paediatric cardiac surgery.

K R Catchpole1, A E B Giddings, M R de Leval, G J Peek, P J Godden, M Utley, S Gallivan, G Hirst, T Dale.   

Abstract

Patient safety will benefit from an approach to human error that examines systemic causes, rather than blames individuals. This study describes a direct observation methodology, based on a threat and error model, prospectively to identify types and sources of systems failures in paediatric cardiac surgery. Of substantive interest were the range, frequency and types of failures that could be identified and whether minor failures could accumulate to form more serious events, as has been the case in other industries. Check lists, notes and video recordings were employed to observe 24 successful operations. A total of 366 failures were recorded. Coordination and communication problems, equipment problems, a relaxed safety culture, patient-related problems and perfusion-related problems were most frequent, with a smaller number of skill, knowledge and decision-making failures. Longer and more risky operations were likely to generate a greater number of minor failures than shorter and lower risk operations, and in seven higher-risk cases frequently occurring minor failures accumulated to threaten the safety of the patient. Non-technical errors were more prevalent than technical errors and task threats were the most prevalent systemic source of error. Adverse events in surgery are likely to be associated with a number of recurring and prospectively identifiable errors. These may be co-incident and cumulative human errors predisposed by threats embedded in the system, rather than due to individual incompetence or negligence. Prospectively identifying and reducing these recurrent failures would lead to improved surgical standards and enhanced patient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16717010     DOI: 10.1080/00140130600568865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  24 in total

1.  Quantifying distraction and interruption in urological surgery.

Authors:  A N Healey; C P Primus; M Koutantji
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-04

2.  The influence of non-technical performance on technical outcome in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Mishra; K Catchpole; T Dale; P McCulloch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Flow disruptions during trauma care.

Authors:  Daniel Shouhed; Renaldo Blocker; Alex Gangi; Eric Ley; Jennifer Blaha; Daniel Margulies; Douglas A Wiegmann; Ben Starnes; Cathy Karl; Richard Karl; Bruce L Gewertz; Ken R Catchpole
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Adverse Events in the Operating Room: Definitions, Prevalence, and Characteristics. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  James J Jung; Jonah Elfassy; Peter Jüni; Teodor Grantcharov
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Ergonomics perspective for identifying and reducing internal operative flow disruption for laparoscopic urological surgery.

Authors:  Latif Al-Hakim; Jiaquan Xiao; Shomik Sengupta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Diagnosing barriers to safety and efficiency in robotic surgery.

Authors:  Ken R Catchpole; Elyse Hallett; Sam Curtis; Tannaz Mirchi; Colby P Souders; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Framework for direct observation of performance and safety in healthcare.

Authors:  Ken Catchpole; David M Neyens; James Abernathy; David Allison; Anjali Joseph; Scott T Reeves
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 7.035

8.  Flow disruptions in robotic-assisted abdominal sacrocolpopexy: does robotic surgery introduce unforeseen challenges for gynecologic surgeons?

Authors:  Colby P Souders; Ken Catchpole; Alex Hannemann; Ronit Lyon; Karyn S Eilber; Catherine Bresee; Tara Cohen; Matthias Weigl; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Safety, efficiency and learning curves in robotic surgery: a human factors analysis.

Authors:  Ken Catchpole; Colby Perkins; Catherine Bresee; M Jonathon Solnik; Benjamin Sherman; John Fritch; Bruno Gross; Samantha Jagannathan; Niv Hakami-Majd; Raymund Avenido; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Human factors in robotic assisted surgery: Lessons from studies 'in the Wild'.

Authors:  Ken Catchpole; Ann Bisantz; M Susan Hallbeck; Matthias Weigl; Rebecca Randell; Merrick Kossack; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.