Literature DB >> 16714123

Sex differences in mental rotation: top-down versus bottom-up processing.

Tracy Butler1, Julianne Imperato-McGinley, Hong Pan, Daniel Voyer, Juan Cordero, Yuan-Shan Zhu, Emily Stern, David Silbersweig.   

Abstract

Functional MRI during performance of a validated mental rotation task was used to assess a neurobiological basis for sex differences in visuospatial processing. Between-sex group analysis demonstrated greater activity in women than in men in dorsalmedial prefrontal and other high-order heteromodal association cortices, suggesting women performed mental rotation in an effortful, "top-down" fashion. In contrast, men activated primary sensory cortices as well as regions involved in implicit learning (basal ganglia) and mental imagery (precuneus), consistent with a more automatic, "bottom-up" strategy. Functional connectivity analysis in association with a measure of behavioral performance showed that, in men (but not women), accurate performance was associated with deactivation of parieto-insular vestibular cortex (PIVC) as part of a visual-vestibular network. Automatic evocation by men to a greater extent than women of this network during mental rotation may represent an effective, unconscious, bottom-up neural strategy which could reasonably account for men's traditional visuospatial performance advantage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16714123     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  34 in total

1.  Crossing the hands is more confusing for females than males.

Authors:  Michelle L Cadieux; Michael Barnett-Cowan; David I Shore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Asymmetric response time functions during left-/right-facing discriminations of rotated objects: The short and the long of it.

Authors:  Jordan A Searle; Jeff P Hamm
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

3.  Males and females show differential brain activation to taste when hungry and sated in gustatory and reward areas.

Authors:  Lori Haase; Erin Green; Claire Murphy
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Spatiotemporal mapping of sex differences during attentional processing.

Authors:  Andres H Neuhaus; Carolin Opgen-Rhein; Carsten Urbanek; Melanie Gross; Eric Hahn; Thi Minh Tam Ta; Simone Koehler; Michael Dettling
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Variation in orbitofrontal cortex volume: relation to sex, emotion regulation and affect.

Authors:  B Locke Welborn; Xenophon Papademetris; Deidre L Reis; Nallakkandi Rajeevan; Suzanne M Bloise; Jeremy R Gray
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Framing the figure: Mental rotation revisited in light of cognitive strategies.

Authors:  A Reyyan Bilge; Holly A Taylor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-01

7.  A voxel-by-voxel parametric fMRI study of motor mental rotation: hemispheric specialization and gender differences in neural processing efficiency.

Authors:  Peka S Christova; Scott M Lewis; Georgios A Tagaris; Kâmil Uğurbil; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Gender differences in unilateral spatial neglect within 24 hours of ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Jonathan T Kleinman; Rebecca F Gottesman; Cameron Davis; Melissa Newhart; Jennifer Heidler-Gary; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Decoding abstract and concrete concept representations based on single-trial fMRI data.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Laura B Baucom; Svetlana V Shinkareva
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Sex differences in auditory processing in peripersonal space: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Stephanie Lynn Simon-Dack; Chris Kelland Friesen; Wolfgang Alexander Teder-Sälejärvi
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 1.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.