Literature DB >> 19403895

An investigation of the neural correlates of attention and effector switching using ERPs.

Robert West1, Kira Bailey, Moses M Langley.   

Abstract

Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were used to examine the neural correlates of attention and effector switching when one or both types of switches were performed on a given trial. The response time data revealed that switch costs tended to increase from attention switches to effector switches to attention+effector switches. For right-hand responses, attention switching was associated with a parietal slow wave and effector switching was associated with a central readiness potential. For left-hand responses, attention switching was associated with a parietal slow wave, and effector switching was associated with a parietal slow wave and a readiness potential. These data suggest that the independence of the neural systems supporting attention and effector switching may be limited to instances where the dominant hemisphere controls the response.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19403895     DOI: 10.3758/CABN.9.2.190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  31 in total

1.  Components of switching intentional set.

Authors:  Matthew F S Rushworth; R E Passingham; A C Nobre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Advance preparation in task switching: what work is being done?

Authors:  Erik M Altmann
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-09

3.  Neural correlates of switching set as measured in fast, event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Anna B Smith; Eric Taylor; Mick Brammer; Katya Rubia
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Dynamics of task sets: evidence from dense-array event-related potentials.

Authors:  Catherine Poulsen; Phan Luu; Colin Davey; Don M Tucker
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-02-25

5.  The influence of rTMS over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on intentional set switching.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt; Rudi De Raedt; Chris Baeken; Lemke Leyman; Hugo D'haenen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues.

Authors:  Rebecca Nicholson; Frini Karayanidis; Elizabeth Bumak; Dane Poboka; Patricia T Michie
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Age differences in task switching and response monitoring: evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Ben Eppinger; Jutta Kray; Axel Mecklinger; Oliver John
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  Is task switching nothing but cue priming? Evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Kerstin Jost; Ulrich Mayr; Frank Rösler
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Differential effects of aging on processes underlying task switching.

Authors:  Robert West; Stephanie Travers
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Effects of caffeine on anticipatory control processes: evidence from a cued task-switch paradigm.

Authors:  Zoë Tieges; Jan Snel; Albert Kok; Niels Plat; Richard Ridderinkhof
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  2 in total

1.  Dissociating stimulus-set and response-set in the context of task-set switching.

Authors:  Paul D Kieffaber; John K Kruschke; Raymond Y Cho; Philip M Walker; William P Hetrick
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Domain-General Processes in Task-Switching.

Authors:  Mariagrazia Capizzi; Ettore Ambrosini; Sandra Arbula; Ilaria Mazzonetto; Antonino Vallesi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.169

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.