Literature DB >> 16713621

Oil well produced water discharges to the North Sea. Part I: comparison of deployed mussels (Mytilus edulis), semi-permeable membrane devices, and the DREAM model predictions to estimate the dispersion of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

Gregory Durell1, Toril Røe Utvik, Ståle Johnsen, Tone Frost, Jerry Neff.   

Abstract

The oil companies operating in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea have conducted field studies since the mid-1990s to monitor produced water discharges to the ocean. These studies have been used to refine monitoring methods, and to develop and validate a dispersion and impact assessment model. This paper summarizes monitoring data from surveys conducted in two major oil and gas production areas, and compares the results to concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in surface waters predicted by the dose-related risk and effect assessment model (DREAM). Blue mussels and semi-permeable membrane devices (SPMDs) were deployed in the Ekofisk and Tampen Regions and analyzed for more than 50 PAH. PAH concentrations in ambient seawater were estimated based on the mussels and SPMD concentrations, and compared to model predictions. Surface water total PAH concentrations ranged from 25 to 350 ng/L within 1 km of the platform discharges and reached background levels of 4-8 ng/L within 5-10 km of the discharge; a 100,000-fold dilution of the PAH in the discharge water. The PAH concentrations in surface water, predicted by three methods, compared well for the Ekofisk Region. The model predicted higher concentrations than the field-based methods for parts of the Tampen Region; particularly the most tidally influenced areas. Tidally-mediated fluctuations in PAH concentrations in surface water must be considered because they affect the estimation of PAH concentrations from mussel and SPMD residue data, and the predictions by the DREAM model. Predictions using mussels, SPMDs, and modeling support and complement each other; all are valuable tools for estimating the fate and impact of chemical contaminants in produced water that are discharged to the ocean.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16713621     DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2006.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Environ Res        ISSN: 0141-1136            Impact factor:   3.130


  6 in total

1.  A Quantitative Ecological Risk Assessment of the Toxicological Risks from Exxon Valdez Subsurface Oil Residues to Sea Otters at Northern Knight Island, Prince William Sound, Alaska.

Authors:  Mark A Harwell; John H Gentile; Charles B Johnson; David L Garshelis; Keith R Parker
Journal:  Hum Ecol Risk Assess       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 5.190

2.  Comparison of the use of mussels and semipermeable membrane devices for monitoring and assessment of accumulation of mutagenic pollutants in marine environment in combination with a novel microbiological mutagenicity assay.

Authors:  Ewa Cheć; Beata Podgórska; Grzegorz Wegrzyn
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Urinary 1-hydroxypyrene levels in offshore workers.

Authors:  Nancy Brenna Hopf; Jorunn Kirkeleit; Stacy L Kramer; Bente Moen; Paul Succop; Mary Beth Genter; Tania Carreón; James Mack; Glenn Talaska
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Quantitative Assessment of Current Risks to Harlequin Ducks in Prince William Sound, Alaska, from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill.

Authors:  Mark A Harwell; John H Gentile; Keith R Parker; Stephen M Murphy; Robert H Day; A Edward Bence; Jerry M Neff; John A Wiens
Journal:  Hum Ecol Risk Assess       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.190

5.  Monitoring of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a produced water disposal area in the Potiguar Basin, Brazilian equatorial margin.

Authors:  Rafael André Lourenço; Fábio Francisco de Oliveira; João Maximino de Souza; Adriana Haddad Nudi; Ângela de Luca Rebello Wagener; Maria de Fátima Guadalupe Meniconi; Eleine Francioni
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  A Time Series Study of Lophelia pertusa and Reef Megafauna Responses to Drill Cuttings Exposure on the Norwegian Margin.

Authors:  Autun Purser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.