Literature DB >> 17562194

Comparison of the use of mussels and semipermeable membrane devices for monitoring and assessment of accumulation of mutagenic pollutants in marine environment in combination with a novel microbiological mutagenicity assay.

Ewa Cheć1, Beata Podgórska, Grzegorz Wegrzyn.   

Abstract

A novel microbiological mutagenicity assay, based on bioluminescence of a marine bacterium Vibrio harveyi mutant strain, potentially suitable for monitoring and assessment of mutagenic pollution of marine environment, has been described recently. Here, we tested the use of this assay, in combination with either mussels (Mytilus sp.) or semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs), in assessment of accumulation of mutagens in marine water (samples of Baltic Sea water were tested). Either similar results were obtained in both systems or higher signals in the SPMD-based system were detected, depending on the tested water samples. We conclude that the use of both mussels and SPMDs in combination with the V. harveyi bioluminescence mutagenicity assay is a method suitable for monitoring and assessment of accumulation of mutagenic pollutants in marine environment, but in some cases the SPMD-based system may provide a more sensitive test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17562194     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-007-9849-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  35 in total

Review 1.  The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay.

Authors:  K Mortelmans; E Zeiger
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2000-11-20       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 2.  Detection of mutagenic pollution of natural environment using microbiological assays.

Authors:  G Wegrzyn; A Czyz
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 3.  Environmental carcinogens that may be involved in human breast cancer etiology.

Authors:  K el-Bayoumy
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Mutagenic activation of aromatic amines by molluscs as a biomarker of marine pollution.

Authors:  F M Díaz-Méndez; A Rodríguez-Ariza; J Usero-García; C Pueyo; J López-Barea
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.216

5.  Comparison of mussels and semi-permeable membrane devices as intertidal monitors of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons at oil spill sites.

Authors:  Paul D Boehm; David S Page; John S Brown; Jerry M Neff; A Edward Bence
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 5.553

Review 6.  Genotoxins and the initiation of sporadic breast cancer.

Authors:  F L Martin
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.000

7.  Optimisation of the microbiological mutagenicity assay based on genetically modified Vibrio harveyi strains.

Authors:  Beata Podgórska; Ewa Chec; Katarzyna Ulanowska; Grzegorz Wegrzyn
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of the Ames test and a newly developed assay for detection of mutagenic pollution of marine environments.

Authors:  Agata Czyz; Hanna Szpilewska; Rafał Dutkiewicz; Wioletta Kowalska; Anna Biniewska-Godlewska; Grzegorz Wegrzyn
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2002-08-26       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 9.  Mutagens in surface waters: a review.

Authors:  Takeshi Ohe; Tetsushi Watanabe; Keiji Wakabayashi
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 10.  Mutagenic activity as a parameter to assess ambient air quality for protection of the environment and human health.

Authors:  Vera Maria Ferrão Vargas
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.433

View more
  1 in total

1.  The use of the Vibrio harveyi luminescence mutagenicity assay as a rapid test for preliminary assessment of mutagenic pollution of marine sediments.

Authors:  Beata Podgórska; Ksenia Pazdro; Grzegorz Wegrzyn
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.653

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.