Literature DB >> 23723680

Quantitative Assessment of Current Risks to Harlequin Ducks in Prince William Sound, Alaska, from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill.

Mark A Harwell1, John H Gentile, Keith R Parker, Stephen M Murphy, Robert H Day, A Edward Bence, Jerry M Neff, John A Wiens.   

Abstract

Harlequin Ducks (Histrionicus histrionicus) were adversely affected by the Exxon Valdez oil spill (EVOS) in Prince William Sound (PWS), Alaska, and some have suggested effects continue two decades later. We present an ecological risk assessment evaluating quantitatively whether PWS seaducks continue to be at-risk from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in residual Exxon Valdez oil. Potential pathways for PAH exposures are identified for initially oiled and never-oiled reference sites. Some potential pathways are implausible (e.g., a seaduck excavating subsurface oil residues), whereas other pathways warrant quantification. We used data on PAH concentrations in PWS prey species, sediments, and seawater collected during 2001-2008 to develop a stochastic individual-based model projecting assimilated doses to seaducks. We simulated exposures to 500,000 individuals in each of eight age/gender classes, capturing the variability within a population of seaducks living in PWS. Doses to the maximum-exposed individuals are ∼400-4,000 times lower than chronic toxicity reference values established using USEPA protocols for seaducks. These exposures are so low that no individual-level effects are plausible, even within a simulated population that is orders-of-magnitude larger than exists in PWS. We conclude that toxicological risks to PWS seaducks from residual Exxon Valdez oil two decades later are essentially non-existent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exxon Valdez oil spill; PAHs; Prince William Sound; ecological risk assessment; ecotoxicology; individual-based models; seaducks

Year:  2012        PMID: 23723680      PMCID: PMC3662083          DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2012.650582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Ecol Risk Assess        ISSN: 1080-7039            Impact factor:   5.190


  42 in total

1.  Estimate of oil persisting on the beaches of Prince William Sound 12 years after the Exxon Valdez oil spill.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Short; Mandy R Lindeberg; Patricia M Harris; Jacek M Maselko; Jerome J Pella; Stanley D Rice
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure in the waters of Prince William Sound after the Exxon Valdez oil spill: 1989-2005.

Authors:  Paul D Boehm; Jerry M Neff; David S Page
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 5.553

3.  Annual changes in body mass and resting metabolism in captive barnacle geese (Branta leucopsis): the importance of wing moult.

Authors:  Steven J Portugal; Jonathan A Green; Patrick J Butler
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Mussels document loss of bioavailable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and the return to baseline conditions for oiled shorelines in Prince William Sound, Alaska.

Authors:  David S Page; Paul D Boehm; John S Brown; Jerry M Neff; William A Burns; A Edward Bence
Journal:  Mar Environ Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.130

5.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon sources related to biomarker levels in fish from Prince William Sound and the Gulf of Alaska.

Authors:  David S Page; Robert J Huggett; John J Stegeman; Keith R Parker; Bruce Woodin; John S Brown; A Edward Bence
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  The effects of ingested petroleum on oviposition and some aspects of reproduction in experimental colonies of mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos).

Authors:  W N Holmes; K P Cavanaugh; J Cronshaw
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1978-11

7.  A Quantitative Ecological Risk Assessment of the Toxicological Risks from Exxon Valdez Subsurface Oil Residues to Sea Otters at Northern Knight Island, Prince William Sound, Alaska.

Authors:  Mark A Harwell; John H Gentile; Charles B Johnson; David L Garshelis; Keith R Parker
Journal:  Hum Ecol Risk Assess       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 5.190

8.  Effects of chronic ingestion of No. 2 fuel oil on mallard ducklings.

Authors:  R C Szaro; G Hensler; G H Heinz
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1981-05

9.  Flightlessness and the energetic cost of wing molt in a large sea duck.

Authors:  Magella Guillemette; David Pelletier; Jean-Marc Grandbois; Patrick J Butler
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  Comparison of renal and salt gland function in three species of wild ducks.

Authors:  Darin C Bennett; Maryanne R Hughes
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  2 in total

1.  Quantifying population-level risks using an individual-based model: sea otters, Harlequin Ducks, and the Exxon Valdez oil spill.

Authors:  Mark A Harwell; John H Gentile; Keith R Parker
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.992

2.  A probabilistic epidemiological model for infectious diseases: The case of COVID-19 at global-level.

Authors:  Heitor Oliveira Duarte; Paulo Gabriel Siqueira; Alexandre Calumbi Antunes Oliveira; Márcio das Chagas Moura
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.302

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.