Literature DB >> 16709275

Quantifying the genomic decay paradox due to Muller's ratchet in human mitochondrial DNA.

Laurence Loewe1.   

Abstract

The observation of high mitochondrial mutation rates in human pedigrees has led to the question of how such an asexual genetic system can survive the accumulation of slightly deleterious mutations caused by Muller's ratchet. I define a null model to quantify in unprecedented detail the threat from extinction caused by Muller's ratchet. This model is general enough to explore the biological significance of Muller's ratchet in various species where its operation has been suspected. For increased precision over a wide range of parameter space I employ individual-based simulations run by evolution@home, the first global computing system for evolutionary biology. After compiling realistic values for the key parameters in human mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) I find that a surprisingly large range of biologically realistic parameter combinations would lead to the extinction of the human line over a period of 20 million years - if accepted wisdom about mtDNA and Muller's ratchet is correct. The resulting genomic decay paradox complements a similar threat from extinction due to mutation accumulation in nuclear DNA and suggests evaluation of unconventional explanations for long-term persistence. A substantial list of potential solutions is given, including compensatory back mutations, mutation rate heterogeneity and occasional recombination in mtDNA. Future work will have to explore which of these actually solves the paradox. Nonetheless, the results presented here provide yet another reason to minimize anthropogenic increase of mutation rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16709275     DOI: 10.1017/S0016672306008123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Res        ISSN: 0016-6723            Impact factor:   1.588


  30 in total

1.  Temporal variation in selection accelerates mutational decay by Muller's ratchet.

Authors:  Alison M Wardlaw; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Viral quasispecies evolution.

Authors:  Esteban Domingo; Julie Sheldon; Celia Perales
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Dynamic mutation-selection balance as an evolutionary attractor.

Authors:  Sidhartha Goyal; Daniel J Balick; Elizabeth R Jerison; Richard A Neher; Boris I Shraiman; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Mutation and the evolution of recombination.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  The population genetics of mutations: good, bad and indifferent.

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; William G Hill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  What can we learn about the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations from DNA sequence data?

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Accumulation of slightly deleterious mutations in mitochondrial protein-coding genes of large versus small mammals.

Authors:  Konstantin Popadin; Leonard V Polishchuk; Leila Mamirova; Dmitry Knorre; Konstantin Gunbin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Mutational interference and the progression of Muller's ratchet when mutations have a broad range of deleterious effects.

Authors:  R Jonas Söderberg; Otto G Berg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  The causes of mutation accumulation in mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  Maurine Neiman; Douglas R Taylor
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Gene genealogies strongly distorted by weakly interfering mutations in constant environments.

Authors:  Jon Seger; Wendy A Smith; Jarom J Perry; Jessalynn Hunn; Zofia A Kaliszewska; Luciano La Sala; Luciana Pozzi; Victoria J Rowntree; Frederick R Adler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.