PURPOSE: Preferentially expressed antigen on melanomas (PRAME) is an interesting antigen for T-cell therapy because it is frequently expressed in melanomas (95%) and other tumor types. Moreover, due to its role in oncogenic transformation, PRAME-negative tumor cells are not expected to easily arise and escape from T-cell immunity. The purpose of this study is to investigate the usefulness of PRAME as target for anticancer T-cell therapies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: HLA-A*0201-subtyped healthy individuals and advanced melanoma patients were screened for CD8+ T cells directed against previously identified HLA-A*0201-binding PRAME peptides by IFN-gamma enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assays and tetramer staining. PRAME-specific T-cell clones were isolated and tested for recognition of melanoma and acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) cell lines. PRAME mRNA expression was determined by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR. RESULTS: In 30% to 40% of healthy individuals and patients, PRA(100-108)-specific CD8+ T cells were detected both after in vitro stimulation and directly ex vivo after isolation by magnetic microbeads. Although CD45RA- memory PRA(100-108)-specific T cells were found in some individuals, the majority of PRA(100-108)-tetramer+ T cells expressed CD45RA, suggesting a naive phenotype. PRA(100-108)-tetramer+ T-cell clones were shown to recognize and lyse HLA-A*0201+ and PRAME+ melanoma but not ALL cell lines. Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR showed significantly lower PRAME mRNA levels in ALL than in melanoma cell lines, suggesting that PRAME expression in ALL is below the recognition threshold of our PRA(100-108)-tetramer+ T cells. CONCLUSION: These data support the usefulness of PRAME and in particular the PRA(100-108) epitope as target for T-cell therapy of PRAME-overexpressing cancers.
PURPOSE: Preferentially expressed antigen on melanomas (PRAME) is an interesting antigen for T-cell therapy because it is frequently expressed in melanomas (95%) and other tumor types. Moreover, due to its role in oncogenic transformation, PRAME-negative tumor cells are not expected to easily arise and escape from T-cell immunity. The purpose of this study is to investigate the usefulness of PRAME as target for anticancer T-cell therapies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:HLA-A*0201-subtyped healthy individuals and advanced melanomapatients were screened for CD8+ T cells directed against previously identified HLA-A*0201-binding PRAME peptides by IFN-gamma enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assays and tetramer staining. PRAME-specific T-cell clones were isolated and tested for recognition of melanoma and acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) cell lines. PRAME mRNA expression was determined by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR. RESULTS: In 30% to 40% of healthy individuals and patients, PRA(100-108)-specific CD8+ T cells were detected both after in vitro stimulation and directly ex vivo after isolation by magnetic microbeads. Although CD45RA- memory PRA(100-108)-specific T cells were found in some individuals, the majority of PRA(100-108)-tetramer+ T cells expressed CD45RA, suggesting a naive phenotype. PRA(100-108)-tetramer+ T-cell clones were shown to recognize and lyse HLA-A*0201+ and PRAME+ melanoma but not ALL cell lines. Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR showed significantly lower PRAME mRNA levels in ALL than in melanoma cell lines, suggesting that PRAME expression in ALL is below the recognition threshold of our PRA(100-108)-tetramer+ T cells. CONCLUSION: These data support the usefulness of PRAME and in particular the PRA(100-108) epitope as target for T-cell therapy of PRAME-overexpressing cancers.
Authors: Concetta Quintarelli; Gianpietro Dotti; Sayyeda T Hasan; Biagio De Angelis; Valentina Hoyos; Santa Errichiello; Martha Mims; Luigia Luciano; Jessica Shafer; Ann M Leen; Helen E Heslop; Cliona M Rooney; Fabrizio Pane; Malcolm K Brenner; Barbara Savoldo Journal: Blood Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Gülçin Gezgin; Sietse J Luk; Jinfeng Cao; Mehmet Dogrusöz; Dirk M van der Steen; Renate S Hagedoorn; Daniëlle Krijgsman; Pieter A van der Velden; Matthew G Field; Gregorius P M Luyten; Karoly Szuhai; J William Harbour; Ekaterina S Jordanova; Mirjam H M Heemskerk; Martine J Jager Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Jessica A Hemminger; Amanda Ewart Toland; Thomas J Scharschmidt; Joel L Mayerson; Denis C Guttridge; O Hans Iwenofu Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Eva Distler; Andrea Bloetz; Jana Albrecht; Saliha Asdufan; Alexander Hohberger; Michaela Frey; Elke Schnürer; Simone Thomas; Matthias Theobald; Udo F Hartwig; Wolfgang Herr Journal: Haematologica Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Katayoun Rezvani; Agnes S M Yong; Abdul Tawab; Behnam Jafarpour; Rhoda Eniafe; Stephan Mielke; Bipin N Savani; Keyvan Keyvanfar; Yixin Li; Roger Kurlander; A John Barrett Journal: Blood Date: 2008-11-06 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Frances Wadelin; Joel Fulton; Paul A McEwan; Keith A Spriggs; Jonas Emsley; David M Heery Journal: Mol Cancer Date: 2010-08-27 Impact factor: 27.401
Authors: Fernando S F Guimarães; Ana P R Abud; Simone M Oliveira; Carolina C Oliveira; Beatriz César; Lucas F Andrade; Lucélia Donatti; Juarez Gabardo; Edvaldo S Trindade; Dorly F Buchi Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-08-22 Impact factor: 4.430