Literature DB >> 21486863

Alloreactive and leukemia-reactive T cells are preferentially derived from naive precursors in healthy donors: implications for immunotherapy with memory T cells.

Eva Distler1, Andrea Bloetz, Jana Albrecht, Saliha Asdufan, Alexander Hohberger, Michaela Frey, Elke Schnürer, Simone Thomas, Matthias Theobald, Udo F Hartwig, Wolfgang Herr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: HLA mismatch antigens are major targets of alloreactive T cells in HLA-incompatible stem-cell transplantation, which can trigger severe graft-versus-host disease and reduce survival in transplant recipients. Our objective was to identify T-cell subsets with reduced in vitro reactivity to allogeneic HLA antigens. DESIGN AND METHODS: We sorted CD4 and CD8 T-cell subsets from peripheral blood by flow cytometry according to their expression of naive and memory markers CD45RA, CD45RO, CD62L, and CCR7. Subsets were defined by a single marker to facilitate future establishment of a clinical-grade procedure for reducing alloreactive T-cell precursors and graft-versus-host disease. T cells were stimulated in mixed lymphocyte reactions against HLA-deficient K562 cells transfected with single HLA-A/-B/-C/-DR/-DQ mismatch alleles. Alloreactivity was measured by interferon-γ spot production and cell proliferation.
RESULTS: We observed that allogeneic HLA-reactivity was preferentially derived from subsets enriched for naïve T cells rather than memory T cells in healthy donors, irrespective of the HLA mismatch allele. This separation was most efficient if CD45RA (versus other markers) was used for sorting. The numbers of allogeneic HLA-reactive effector cells were in median 7.2-fold and 16.6-fold lower in CD45RA(neg) memory CD8 and CD4 T cells than in entire CD8 and CD4 T cells, respectively. In contrast, proliferation of memory T cells in response to allogeneic HLA was more variably reduced (CD8) or equivalent (CD4) when compared to that of naïve T cells. We also demonstrated in HLA-matched donor-patient pairs that leukemia-reactive CD8 cytotoxic T-lymphocytes were mainly derived from subsets enriched for naïve T cells compared to memory T cells.
CONCLUSIONS: Memory T-cell subsets of most healthy individuals showed decreased allogeneic HLA-reactivity, but lacked significant anti-leukemia responses in vitro. The clinical use of memory or naïve-depleted T cells might be beneficial for HLA-mismatched patients at high risk of graft-versus-host disease and low risk of leukemia relapse. Preferred allografts are those which contain leukemia-reactive memory T cells. Alternatively, replenishment with leukemia-reactive T cells isolated from naïve subsets is desirable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21486863      PMCID: PMC3128222          DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2010.037481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


  36 in total

1.  IL-21-treated naive CD45RA+ CD8+ T cells represent a reliable source for producing leukemia-reactive cytotoxic T lymphocytes with high proliferative potential and early differentiation phenotype.

Authors:  Jana Albrecht; Michaela Frey; Daniel Teschner; Alexander Carbol; Matthias Theobald; Wolfgang Herr; Eva Distler
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 6.968

2.  HLA-DC antigens can serve as recognition elements for human cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

Authors:  H Spits; J Borst; M Giphart; J Coligan; C Terhorst; J E De Vries
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Pregnancy induces minor histocompatibility antigen-specific cytotoxic T cells: implications for stem cell transplantation and immunotherapy.

Authors:  Rob M Verdijk; Antoinette Kloosterman; Jos Pool; Maarten van de Keur; Albert M I H Naipal; Astrid G S van Halteren; Anneke Brand; Tuna Mutis; Els Goulmy
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-10-30       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Impact of HLA class I and class II high-resolution matching on outcomes of unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation: HLA-C mismatching is associated with a strong adverse effect on transplantation outcome.

Authors:  Neal Flomenberg; Lee Ann Baxter-Lowe; Dennis Confer; Marcelo Fernandez-Vina; Alexandra Filipovich; Mary Horowitz; Carolyn Hurley; Craig Kollman; Claudio Anasetti; Harriet Noreen; Ann Begovich; William Hildebrand; Effie Petersdorf; Barbara Schmeckpeper; Michelle Setterholm; Elizabeth Trachtenberg; Thomas Williams; Edmond Yunis; Daniel Weisdorf
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Human CD62L- memory T cells are less responsive to alloantigen stimulation than CD62L+ naive T cells: potential for adoptive immunotherapy and allodepletion.

Authors:  Aaron E Foster; Marina Marangolo; Mary M Sartor; Stephen I Alexander; Min Hu; Kenneth F Bradstock; David J Gottlieb
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Functional leukemia-associated antigen-specific memory CD8+ T cells exist in healthy individuals and in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia before and after stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Katayoun Rezvani; Matthias Grube; Jason M Brenchley; Giuseppe Sconocchia; Hiroshi Fujiwara; David A Price; Emma Gostick; Ko Yamada; Jan Melenhorst; Richard Childs; Nancy Hensel; Daniel C Douek; A John Barrett
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Effect of HLA compatibility on engraftment of bone marrow transplants in patients with leukemia or lymphoma.

Authors:  C Anasetti; D Amos; P G Beatty; F R Appelbaum; W Bensinger; C D Buckner; R Clift; K Doney; P J Martin; E Mickelson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-01-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  The many important facets of T-cell repertoire diversity.

Authors:  Janko Nikolich-Zugich; Mark K Slifka; Ilhem Messaoudi
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 9.  Central memory and effector memory T cell subsets: function, generation, and maintenance.

Authors:  Federica Sallusto; Jens Geginat; Antonio Lanzavecchia
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 28.527

10.  An alloresponse in humans is dominated by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) cross-reactive with a single Epstein-Barr virus CTL epitope: implications for graft-versus-host disease.

Authors:  S R Burrows; R Khanna; J M Burrows; D J Moss
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Adoptive T-cell therapies for refractory/relapsed leukemia and lymphoma: current strategies and recent advances.

Authors:  Lauren McLaughlin; C Russell Cruz; Catherine M Bollard
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2015-12

2.  Depletion of naive T cells using clinical grade magnetic CD45RA beads: a new approach for GVHD prophylaxis.

Authors:  D Teschner; E Distler; D Wehler; M Frey; D Marandiuc; K Langeveld; M Theobald; S Thomas; W Herr
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Impact of T cell selection methods in the success of clinical adoptive immunotherapy.

Authors:  Natalia Ramírez; Lorea Beloki; Miriam Ciaúrriz; Mercedes Rodríguez-Calvillo; David Escors; Cristina Mansilla; Eva Bandrés; Eduardo Olavarría
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Generation of memory T cells for adoptive transfer using clinical-grade anti-CD62L magnetic beads.

Authors:  S Verfuerth; P S E Sousa; L Beloki; M Murray; M D Peters; A T O'Neill; S Mackinnon; M W Lowdell; R Chakraverty; E R Samuel
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Role of naive-derived T memory stem cells in T-cell reconstitution following allogeneic transplantation.

Authors:  Alessandra Roberto; Luca Castagna; Veronica Zanon; Stefania Bramanti; Roberto Crocchiolo; James E McLaren; Sara Gandolfi; Paolo Tentorio; Barbara Sarina; Inna Timofeeva; Armando Santoro; Carmelo Carlo-Stella; Benedetto Bruno; Cristiana Carniti; Paolo Corradini; Emma Gostick; Kristin Ladell; David A Price; Mario Roederer; Domenico Mavilio; Enrico Lugli
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Major Histocompatibility Mismatch and Donor Choice for Second Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation.

Authors:  Philip H Imus; Amanda L Blackford; Maria Bettinotti; Brian Iglehart; August Dietrich; Noah Tucker; Heather Symons; Kenneth R Cooke; Leo Luznik; Ephraim J Fuchs; Robert A Brodsky; William H Matsui; Carol Ann Huff; Douglas Gladstone; Richard F Ambinder; Ivan M Borrello; Lode J Swinnen; Richard J Jones; Javier Bolaños-Meade
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  T-cell tracking, safety, and effect of low-dose donor memory T-cell infusions after αβ T cell-depleted hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Sergey Blagov; Ivan V Zvyagin; Larisa Shelikhova; Rimma Khismatullina; Dmitriy Balashov; Ekaterina Komech; Viktoria Fomchenkova; Mikhail Shugay; Julia Starichkova; Elena Kurnikova; Dmitriy Pershin; Maria Fadeeva; Svetlana Glushkova; Yakov Muzalevskii; Alexei Kazachenok; Maria Efimenko; Elena Osipova; Galina Novichkova; Dmitriy Chudakov; Alexei Maschan; Michael Maschan
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 5.483

8.  HLA-DPB1 mismatch alleles represent powerful leukemia rejection antigens in CD4 T-cell immunotherapy after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation.

Authors:  W Herr; Y Eichinger; J Beshay; A Bloetz; S Vatter; C Mirbeth; E Distler; U F Hartwig; S Thomas
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  Targeting polo-like kinase 1 suppresses essential functions of alloreactive T cells.

Authors:  Carsten Berges; Manik Chatterjee; Max S Topp; Hermann Einsele
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.829

10.  Correlation of infused CD3+CD8+ cells with single-donor dominance after double-unit cord blood transplantation.

Authors:  Filippo Milano; Shelly Heimfeld; Ted Gooley; Jack Jinneman; Ian Nicoud; Colleen Delaney
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.